Per Vinny Cerrato, JC is our QB this season!

These rumors are getting stupid from all these "sources"! I would have to think there is zero merit to Cutler coming to DC.

CERRATO: “JASON CAMPBELL IS GOING TO BE OUR QUARTERBACK” (http://www.profootballtalk.com/2009/03/17/cerrato-jason-campbell-is-going-to-be-our-quarterback/)

Posted by Mike Florio on March 17, 2009, 9:07 p.m.
The rumors of the Washington Redskins possibly trading for Broncos quarterback Jay Cutler, fueled by a bleacherreport.com story setting forth a far-fetched three-team trade scenario that might or might not have been labeled ambiguously as “satire” before the predicted 5:00 p.m. EDT announcement of the deal, have already created a sufficient stir to require the Redskins to address them.
In an item posted at 6:41 p.m. EDT on Tuesday, executive V.P. of football operations Vinny Cerrato told David Elfin of the Washington Times that the Redskins “haven’t talked to anyone” about Cutler, and that “Jason is going to be our quarterback this season (http://washingtontimes.com/weblogs/redskins/2009/Mar/17/jason-our-quarterback/).”
We don’t want to pick nits here, but Cerrato didn’t say that the Redskins aren’t interested in Cutler, only that they “haven’t talked to anyone” about him. And when Cerrato says that “Jason is going to be our quarterback,” Cerrato omits the key words “starting” or “backup.”
We’re kidding. Sort of.
Here’s the deal — the Cutler fiasco has confirmed that teams need to handle their starting quarterbacks like a college (http://www.profootballtalk.com/category/rumor-mill/#) football coach handles his current job. Neither can afford to allow word to get out that a change might be coming. If change is going to happen, it needs to come swiftly and without advance rumor or speculation.
It’s the “I’m not going to be the Alabama coach (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2705288)” phenomenon; the Redskins would end up with the next disgruntled starting quarterback if credible word were to get out that the Redskins are thinking about making a change at the most important position on the roster.

Just watched the NFL Network and they all unanimously agree that if the phone rings to trade JC they answer it.

Per your thread subject, I wasn't sure whether you were talking about Jason Campbell or Jay Cutler ;-)

Glad to hear this from VC. Besides, I don't want that crybaby Cutler here anyway.

Unfortunately Vinny saying this doesn't mean a damn thing. Vinny said we weren't interested in Haynesworth, too. GM's lie all the time. It's part of their job.

Campbell hasn't been give much credit in my opinion. I still think he'll be a Pro Bowler. Let's see what happens after this year now that he'll have a second year to get comfortable in Zorn's system.
I don't want Cutler either. We'd probably overpay anyway like we did for CP. I thought Champ for CP was more than fair. Why'd we have to throw in a 2nd round pick?

Campbell hasn't been give much credit in my opinion. I still think he'll be a Pro Bowler. Let's see what happens after this year now that he'll have a second year to get comfortable in Zorn's system.
I don't want Cutler either. We'd probably overpay anyway like we did for CP. I thought Champ for CP was more than fair. Why'd we have to throw in a 2nd round pick?

I think as of now we still got the better part of that trade with Denver.

Campbell is on such a short leash though

Unfortunately Vinny saying this doesn't mean a damn thing. Vinny said we weren't interested in Haynesworth, too. GM's lie all the time. It's part of their job.

Sure I guess they do stretch the truth but that's a case by case situation!

But I disagree. I think Vinny is telling the truth and we will stick with JC.

Are far as AH that was a smart move on Vinny's behalf, what do you expect him to show his hand and let all the league know we where gonna make a run at the guy, of course not. It was darn near common knowledge to begin with.

Campbell is on such a short leash though

Do you think JC will be traded for Cutler if the option presents itself?