Holt released by Rams [Archive] - Commanders Post at The Warpath


	Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum > Holt released by Rams PDA Holt released by Rams Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SFREDSKIN 03-13-2009, 10:13 PM Sooner or later someone was going to post this. The Rams release wide receiver Torry Holt on Friday - ESPN (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3978180) GusFrerotte 03-13-2009, 10:34 PM If we can get him for the right price, I say go for it. Our Wr corp sucks and the jury is out whether these rooks are ever going to pan out for another year or two. skinsnut 03-13-2009, 11:27 PM Getting Holt would be far more impressive to me than getting Haynesworth. I really don't know if it is feasible though..It sure would be cool! I can dream cant I? MTK 03-13-2009, 11:27 PM Pass. skinsnut 03-13-2009, 11:33 PM Pass. Why would you say that...our offense sucks...Holt is fantastic...is it because of the money we'd have to pay to get him? Are you in love with ARE or the other nobodys? Imagine Moss and Holt while grooming the rookies...odds are 1 of em wont make it. It is arguable that Holt is better than Moss He is a high impact player...one that I believe we should go after hard That Guy 03-13-2009, 11:53 PM if you could get holt or harrison in super cheap, it might be worthwhile to have them help the rookies... i don't know how much they'd want though. vallin21 03-14-2009, 12:00 AM Why would you say that...our offense sucks...Holt is fantastic...is it because of the money we'd have to pay to get him? Are you in love with ARE or the other nobodys? Imagine Moss and Holt while grooming the rookies...odds are 1 of em wont make it. It is arguable that Holt is better than Moss He is a high impact player...one that I believe we should go after hard Are you really serious? Holt is 33 and ain't getting any younger. We have two young WR'S that need to prove their worth. It makes no sense to get Holt, were not in fantasy football. Our offense does not suck, and Holt it is not even close to Moss talent wise. Seriously dude, quit grabbin on Holt's jock, HE'S NOT THAT GOOD!! There's a reason why the Rams didn't pay the roster bonus to keep him. That alone should tell you something. :doh: Zerohero 03-14-2009, 12:11 AM Is "Roster Bonus Year" code for "year he will get cut no matter"? Seems like most teams would keep some veterans or at least not go through the motions of cutting just to resign if there were no roster bonus provisions. MTK 03-14-2009, 12:16 AM Are you really serious? Holt is 33 and ain't getting any younger. We have two young WR'S that need to prove their worth. It makes no sense to get Holt, were not in fantasy football. Our offense does not suck, and Holt it is not even close to Moss talent wise. Seriously dude, quit grabbin on Holt's jock, HE'S NOT THAT GOOD!! There's a reason why the Rams didn't pay the roster bonus to keep him. That alone should tell you something. :doh: I agree. We've got two young WRs to develop, it doesn't make much sense to chase an aging WR who has clearly lost a step. We have other more pressing needs. Dirtbag59 03-14-2009, 01:02 AM We screwed up Jason Taylor. Given our history with Recievers I'd say we'd have a pretty good chance of slightly tarnishing Holt's legacy.