Zorn not using Wildcat next year

Pages : 1 2 [3] 4 5

44ever
02-22-2009, 04:04 PM
I take it straight from the players mouths. Portis said that halfway through the season the coaches started to tell him how to hit the hole, how to fall and thus their offensive production went way down. Portis was extremely vocal and upset about the fact that he was expected to be the workhorse and was constantly "running into a bunch of jerseys". The NFL has evolved. Archaic coaching does not work anymore. You can't just call 50-gut on every other first down and expect your guys to simply "execute" it. This might have worked 30 years ago, not now. While our O lines' age and injuries could be partly to blame, I still maintain that stubborn coaching and dated philosophies are the death of a lot of potential talent in the NFL. This has been a problem for a while now...coaches not willing to relinquish control or to adapt with the times.

What are you talking about? Portis wanted the ball
Clinton Portis and the Quest for 1,500 Yards - D.C. Sports Bog (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dcsportsbog/2008/12/clinton_portis_and_the_quest_f.html)

DirtyLandry
02-22-2009, 04:23 PM
What are you talking about? Portis wanted the ball
Clinton Portis and the Quest for 1,500 Yards - D.C. Sports Bog (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dcsportsbog/2008/12/clinton_portis_and_the_quest_f.html)

Your little article is completely irrelevant. Clinton made these comments late in the season while he was 93 yards away from an important stat among running backs. You could not blame him for wanting this number after being the sacrificial lamb of this team for four years. While many players would deny it, stats and milestones are important to them. If you followed the team closely enough, you would know that Clinton has gone on record several times regarding his displeasure with being made to shoulder the load. Gibbs would let Clinton take himself in and out of the game at will, whereas Zorn stripped him of this right. Just look at the number of carries Clinton had vs. Betts. Clinton has made several comments as well (often said in jest) about losing good playing years because of being the workhorse and taking the pounding that he has. I can't think of another team in this league now that primarily utilizes a single running back like we do. No One in today's nfl should expect a RB to take 90% of the carries and Clinton would tell you the same.

53Fan
02-22-2009, 04:41 PM
I understand some of your points DirtyLandry and also think Zorn got to be a little to conservative. Maybe by neccessity, I don't know. But Portis pretty much says whatever is to his benefit.

44ever
02-22-2009, 04:42 PM
Your little article is completely irrelevant. Clinton made these comments late in the season while he was 93 yards away from an important stat among running backs. You could not blame him for wanting this number after being the sacrificial lamb of this team for four years. While many players would deny it, stats and milestones are important to them. If you followed the team closely enough, you would know that Clinton has gone on record several times regarding his displeasure with being made to shoulder the load. Gibbs would let Clinton take himself in and out of the game at will, whereas Zorn stripped him of this right. Just look at the number of carries Clinton had vs. Betts. Clinton has made several comments as well (often said in jest) about losing good playing years because of being the workhorse and taking the pounding that he has. I can't think of another team in this league now that primarily utilizes a single running back like we do. No One in today's nfl should expect a RB to take 90% of the carries and Clinton would tell you the same.

Hey Im all for a 2 Back system. If what your saying about Portis is true then the article reveals a double standard. It would imply he only wants to carry the ball often for his own selfish reasons and not for the teams success. I dont believe that to be the case. But if you believe that then that means you agree with Riggins. I don't.

Anyway this is getting way off subject. Getting back to where we started. You dont like Zorns ability and said he has shown none. I disagree.

DirtyLandry
02-22-2009, 04:51 PM
Hey Im all for a 2 Back system. If what your saying about Portis is trus then the article reveals a double standard. It would imply he only wants to carry the ball often for his own selfish reasons and not for the teams success. I dont believe that to be the case. But if you believe that then that means you agree with Riggins. I don't.

Anyway this is getting way off subject. Getting back to where we started. You dont like Zorns ability and said he has shown none. I disagree.

We'll agree to disagree. On a side note, Zorn learned from the school of "Chuck Knox". Often referred to "Ground Chuck" for his conservative ground rushing attack.

I will give Zorn another year to prove he can change, I just have my doubts becuase he showed us nothing different in an entire season. For all of us, I hope I'm wrong.

44ever
02-22-2009, 05:49 PM
We'll agree to disagree. On a side note, Zorn learned from the school of "Chuck Knox". Often referred to "Ground Chuck" for his conservative ground rushing attack.

I will give Zorn another year to prove he can change, I just have my doubts becuase he showed us nothing different in an entire season. For all of us, I hope I'm wrong.

I dont blame you for your doubts brother. And I may be overly optomistic. I just think there are to many variables to pin the blame on any one specific player/coach. I hope your wrong too. But I may be wrong and for all of us I hope not. I think we agree to give Zorn a 2nd year and I think thats a logical way to see it. Hopefully this time next year we will both be happy with the Skins and have a lot more to agree on. see ya on the next thread.:boxing:

MiraclesHappen07
02-22-2009, 07:57 PM
Ok, but i ask this...say we did run the wildcat, and it works but then what happens when teams are able to deffend us aganist the wildcat, and we are forced to use our orginal offense which is right now still not completely grasped yet by our players?

Slingin Sammy 33
02-22-2009, 11:06 PM
Wildcat = gimmick or fad (offense of the week).

Randel El on a reverse pass or double pass is fine. We need to concentrate on executing the WCO. With a healthy OL we should be able to return to the 6-2 form from early in the season.

Slingin Sammy 33
02-22-2009, 11:22 PM
Your little article is completely irrelevant. Clinton made these comments late in the season while he was 93 yards away from an important stat among running backs. You could not blame him for wanting this number after being the sacrificial lamb of this team for four years. While many players would deny it, stats and milestones are important to them. If you followed the team closely enough, you would know that Clinton has gone on record several times regarding his displeasure with being made to shoulder the load. Gibbs would let Clinton take himself in and out of the game at will, whereas Zorn stripped him of this right. Just look at the number of carries Clinton had vs. Betts. Clinton has made several comments as well (often said in jest) about losing good playing years because of being the workhorse and taking the pounding that he has. I can't think of another team in this league now that primarily utilizes a single running back like we do. No One in today's nfl should expect a RB to take 90% of the carries and Clinton would tell you the same.How about Portis STFU, stop whining, and make some damn plays. He's a solid back but his mouth on the JT show and me first attitude is wearing pretty thin. What #1 back pulls himself out of the game once his team gets in the Red Zone. Larry Brown didn't, Riggo didn't, Byner didn't, Stephen Davis didn't, LT doesn't, Peterson doesn't. Who gives a $hit about personal stats, I thought the point of NFL football was to win games. How about supporting your teammates and coaching staff rather than blasting them in the media in the midst of a tough stretch of games. Portis isn't the greatest thing since sliced bread and I'm certainly not going to him for an offensive game plan. Maybe if he was willing to take some of the coaching from Stump and Zorn he would've been closer to or hit his numbers.

Bad OL = poor offensive production. Did Zorn's playcalling go from great at 6-2 to crap in a couple of weeks?

53Fan
02-23-2009, 12:46 AM
How about Portis STFU, stop whining, and make some damn plays. He's a solid back but his mouth on the JT show and me first attitude is wearing pretty thin. What #1 back pulls himself out of the game once his team gets in the Red Zone. Larry Brown didn't, Riggo didn't, Byner didn't, Stephen Davis didn't, LT doesn't, Peterson doesn't. Who gives a $hit about personal stats, I thought the point of NFL football was to win games. How about supporting your teammates and coaching staff rather than blasting them in the media in the midst of a tough stretch of games. Portis isn't the greatest thing since sliced bread and I'm certainly not going to him for an offensive game plan. Maybe if he was willing to take some of the coaching from Stump and Zorn he would've been closer to or hit his numbers.

Bad OL = poor offensive production. Did Zorn's playcalling go from great at 6-2 to crap in a couple of weeks?
:laughing2 Damn Sammy! Portis is also the one who whines about being taken out of a game so they can run plays Betts has practiced all week because Portis didn't practice and apparently didn't know the plays. Baltimore.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum