MTK
02-13-2009, 11:10 PM
If I was going to throw money at one big FA it would be Karlos Dansby. He can do it all at LB and I think he's just hitting his stride as a big time player.
The Case For...MTK 02-13-2009, 11:10 PM If I was going to throw money at one big FA it would be Karlos Dansby. He can do it all at LB and I think he's just hitting his stride as a big time player. T.O.Killa 02-13-2009, 11:12 PM A good 4-3 linebacker that is proven in the pros. Dansby or Scott. 44ever 02-13-2009, 11:21 PM If I was going to throw money at one big FA it would be Karlos Dansby.* He can do it all at LB and I think he's just hitting his stride as a big time player.Matty he would be awsome but he's got a franchise tag waiting for him Im sure. Would you still be interested if that was the case? MTK 02-13-2009, 11:33 PM Matty he would be awsome but he's got a franchise tag waiting for him Im sure. Would you still be interested if that was the case? If he's franchised, definitely not. BeastsoftheNFCeast 02-14-2009, 12:02 AM No doubt, a dominant OT in the draft. Every team I can remember that drafted an OT in the first round in the last few years improved the next season. Trample the Elderly 02-14-2009, 12:05 AM So the consensus is a punter and a couple of guys who have never played a down in the NFL. Haynesworth has money written all over him. DirtyLandry 02-14-2009, 12:48 AM Haynesworth has money written all over him. Some would argue that Haynesworth is not only the most dominant player at his position, but the most dominant player in the league. In making my case for one player, I pointed out how such a force at DT could vastly improve and entire side of the ball. I would rather give a proven stud tackle in his prime a shit ton of cash than take a gamble on some kid from college. Also, why break tradition? We're a team that spends high dollar amounts on free agents and if we're gonna continue the trend, then this should be the guy to do it with. skinsfaninok 02-14-2009, 12:54 AM ANQUAN BOLDIN!!!! Is a True Stud #1 WR, this would mean Moss can be a very good Num2, and Thomas can be the 3. I would trade our 13th Pick and Randel El to AZ... We can add a DL or OL later in the draft or via F.A. Think about it.. Boldin,Moss,Cooley,Portis WOW! WaldSkins 02-14-2009, 12:58 AM ANQUAN BOLDIN!!!! Is a True Stud #1 WR, this would mean Moss can be a very good Num2, and Thomas can be the 3. I would trade our 13th Pick and Randel El to AZ... We can add a DL or OL later in the draft or via F.A. Think about it.. Boldin,Moss,Cooley,Portis WOW! I would like to see El in the slot next year for us. Trample the Elderly 02-14-2009, 01:02 AM Some would argue that Haynesworth is not only the most dominant player at his position, but the most dominant player in the league. In making my case for one player, I pointed out how such a force at DT could vastly improve and entire side of the ball. I would rather give a proven stud tackle in his prime a shit ton of cash than take a gamble on some kid from college. Also, why break tradition? We're a team that spends high dollar amounts on free agents and if we're gonna continue the trend, then this should be the guy to do it with. It's a tradition I'd wish they'd get away from. If it is an uncapped year in 2010 I can see the logic. If it's not we'll have to eat a big s**t sandwich in cap space. Personally, I'd like to start developing our own Haynesworths, Dansbys, and Jacobs. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum