ESPN Power Rankings

i think this is a bad year for the rams, they've gotten a year older, but not any better...

the titans are good, have been, are, will be... they replaced eddie george with chris brown who is a much better back imo (though injured right now). they've lost some good players, but kearse can work himself into concussions and injuries... overall probably a step down, but they were still a 12-4 team.

looking it over again, the ratings this week are really pretty good... maybe switch the titans and the vikes, rams are a bit high.

btw, Deion on PTI raving about how good gibbs is... that's kinda nice.

Cardinals ALMOST beat the #11 team and get the last spot? Talk about a shaft!

if they had shipp/boldin, they'd be a LOT higher... mccwon isn't the greatest QB, but with what looks like 2 possible top ten WRs and a decent RB... that's gotta be nice.

i think 12 is good for us yah

I cast my own vote, here's the aggregate results of all voters... skins at 10, 2 spots higher than the staff rankings, rams and titans are also lower, but GB is awfully high... overall a bit better though.


Real-time rankings from across SportsNation:
--------------------------------------------------
1. Pats
2. Iggles
3. Vikes
4. Hawks
5. CheeseHeads
6. Dolts
7. Titans
8. Those horse guys
9. KC doesn't believe in tackling
10. WASHINTGON REDSKINS
11. Jets
12. Steelers
13. Rams
14. Panthers
15. Ravens
16. Brown
17. Vick
18. Jags
19. Aints
20. Lions
21. dalASS
22. Bengs
23. TB Sucs
24. Boy I Love Losing Super Bowls
25. LT owns you
26. Those REALLY old guys
27. Texans
28. Dolphins (also known as "We Love to Lose")
29. gints
30. Bears
31. 49ers
32. Cards

I think the Iggles are overrated......and shouldn't the Browns that won (even with Deon and Ray Lewis in the game cough cough) be ranked ABOVE the Cowboys that got SOUNDLY BEAT by the Vikings?????????????? :confused:

well, browns are 16, boys 21 in the user rankings... and rams are below the skins too, titans are in a more reasonable place, etc...