SmootSmack
01-23-2009, 03:43 PM
That doesn't really make sense though. What GM has a close relationship with the owners father? To me the fact that he knows the father that well tells me that the relationship has definitely crossed the line from business to personal. I understand your general point that it's not all his fault and I don't pretend it is. But this organization just needs someone new even if it is just someone new to blame. He have had a bad last decade and we are still blaming the same person for it! Isn't that alone reason enough for change?
I do agree on the point that Snyders day to day meddling is most likely overblown.
Well Snyder's father's been dead for about six years now you know, but the point was just that Snyder's dad and VC were friends. I think more so than VC and Dan. Snyder's dad's influence on the team and its decisions the first couple of years that Dan Snyder owned the team is a whole other story not really worth bringing up...but I digress.
celts32
01-23-2009, 03:54 PM
Yea I did know his father had passed away. I just think it's odd that he had such a close relationship with him. To me that's almost worse...if I ran a business and had an employee who I knew my late father was so fond of I would probably have a hard time ever letting that employee go.
SmootSmack
01-23-2009, 04:00 PM
I don't think it stopped him in other cases. But I see your point.
freddyg12
01-23-2009, 04:53 PM
The friendship between Dan Snyder and Vinny Cerrato is sooooo overblown, VC was actually probably better friends with Gerald Snyder than with Cerrato.
And Snyder's "meddling" in team affairs is overblown as well, especially in relation to other owners' "meddling" with their teams.
But ultimately it doesn't matter. Ultimately, VC just has to be removed from any football-related decision making. Not so much because of what he has and hasn't accomplished, but because fans just don't believe anything but what they decided to believe a long time ago.
As for Sean Taylor, we miss him big time on the field! Big time! Not to mention the fact that were he alive we probably would have spent the picks on Moore and/or Horton elsewhere, perhaps the line.
I don't have your sources Smoot, so I just base my opinions on what I read & what's reported by espn et al. I don't know the extent of the 'meddling.' Maybe it should be clarified that Snyder negotiates contracts & makes some major personel decisions as a matter of standard business. If he doesn't do that, then I've been misled by various reporters.
Maybe that is what many fans see as "meddling." Rather than getting caught up in semantics, I'll just say that it appears to me that he makes or influences decisions that he is not best suited to, based on his background (he's been owner for 10 years now but he still doesn't have a lot of football experience).
What complicates this for many fans is that Snyder isn't very accessible and doesn't reach out to the fan base.
I truly hope he's giving Vinny the space he needs, and I would love to see both of them succeed of course. I even believe they can, it's just my opinion that in order to do so Snyder needs to change more than Vinny does. But if their personal relationship gets in the way - which again I don't know - then some change is needed.
Paintrain
01-23-2009, 05:03 PM
We could change GM's and things would be dandy for a short time, but I really think that over time people would only go back to blaming Snyder for "meddling" and they wouldn't believe that the GM is truly calling the shots.
The only thing that would change the perception of the media and fans, regardless of who is in the GM/personnel role, is a team that consistently is a threat to win 10+ games and go deep into the playoffs.
I'd be fine with a change of regime with the caveat that it's a full changing of football operations with one voice, one philosophy and a organizational structure that we're committed to. Just adding Allen to the muddled mess we currently have is rather pointless.
SBXVII
01-23-2009, 06:15 PM
Oh boy :doh:
I could have said I wanted Outback Steak house but that would be requesting Pioli and he's already taken.
Is there anyone in the catagory of .....T.G.I.Fridays, Applebee's, Carlos Okelly's? or are we going to be stuck with fast food and cheap beer? lol.
The Goat
01-23-2009, 06:16 PM
The only thing that would change the perception of the media and fans, regardless of who is in the GM/personnel role, is a team that consistently is a threat to win 10+ games and go deep into the playoffs.
I'd be fine with a change of regime with the caveat that it's a full changing of football operations with one voice, one philosophy and a organizational structure that we're committed to. Just adding Allen to the muddled mess we currently have is rather pointless.
I think that's a good insight and probably correct. Also believe it will take a strong personality, though not necessarily a famous one, to be able to fundamentally change the FO approach to draft, FA etc (assuming a fundamental change isn't already occurring). I have no idea whether Allen is that personality.
SKINSFAN63
01-23-2009, 07:13 PM
He brought Gaines Adams,Talib,and Cadillac through the draft for the Bucs so the guy has somewhat of an eye for talent unlike Cerrato
Skinny Tee
01-23-2009, 07:41 PM
He brought Gaines Adams,Talib,and Cadillac through the draft for the Bucs so the guy has somewhat of an eye for talent unlike Cerrato
Yeah...hitting with your number one usually isn't that easy.
...Welcome to the board
Ruhskins
01-23-2009, 08:18 PM
Yeah...hitting with your number one usually isn't that easy.
...Welcome to the board
Sure, like when we got Rod Gardner and Patrick Ramsey, right? :doh: