|
|
53Fan 01-19-2009, 11:01 PM Spags was also not nearly the hot commodity he was last offseason. Chiefs, Broncos, Jets, and Lions all interviewed him and passed.
As for who will replace Spagnuolo in NY, it will probably will be an in-house person since their first choice Dom Capers (an outsider) passed the offer to take the job in Green Bay
Bill Sheridan was promoted from LB's coach to DC.
KingOFCali 01-19-2009, 11:44 PM Wow And to think the players still wanted Haslett. Rams will still be a junk team next year.
redskins301 01-20-2009, 12:37 AM thank god steve is not on the giants
The Goat 01-20-2009, 12:49 AM Who wants to bet the Giants regress next season? Honestly, the NFC East is looking a little less intimidating these days. Cowboys: what a mess. Seriously, Dallas reminds of that reality show where Mini-Me took a leak on the wall (from the edge of his motocart). Eagles: something tells me there will be a shake-up of sorts in Philly but who knows. I'd like to say the B & G have an opportunity to compete for the division but 1) it's way too early to predict squat 2) the four beasts of the East will just beat the shit out of each other especially if we're playing about the same level.
Ruhskins 01-20-2009, 11:27 AM Who wants to bet the Giants regress next season? Honestly, the NFC East is looking a little less intimidating these days. Cowboys: what a mess. Seriously, Dallas reminds of that reality show where Mini-Me took a leak on the wall (from the edge of his motocart). Eagles: something tells me there will be a shake-up of sorts in Philly but who knows. I'd like to say the B & G have an opportunity to compete for the division but 1) it's way too early to predict squat 2) the four beasts of the East will just beat the shit out of each other especially if we're playing about the same level.
I wouldn't mind a weak division. I mean look at AZ, they took advantage of being in a weak division, peaked at the right time (playoffs), and now are Superbowl bound. Even if the division is "weak" the media will hype the Cowboys, and to a lesser extent the Giants and Iggles.
SFREDSKIN 01-20-2009, 12:29 PM I wouldn't mind a weak division. I mean look at AZ, they took advantage of being in a weak division, peaked at the right time (playoffs), and now are Superbowl bound. Even if the division is "weak" the media will hype the Cowboys, and to a lesser extent the Giants and Iggles.
You mean like the 49ers of the 80's and 90's? That team got way too much credit in my opinion.
cdskins26 01-20-2009, 02:03 PM Spags finds himself in a deep hole, but give it three years before the rams are respectable.
Ruhskins 01-20-2009, 03:39 PM You mean like the 49ers of the 80's and 90's? That team got way too much credit in my opinion.
Yes but you still have to win the big games, and I know the 49ers did that. Once again, a weak division gives you a better opportunity to get to the playoffs. But once you are there, you have to show up and play. As I've stated before, I don't think this year's Redskins would have shown up for the playoffs if they had been in Arizona's situation.
SFREDSKIN 01-20-2009, 03:42 PM Yes but you still have to win the big games, and I know the 49ers did that. Once again, a weak division gives you a better opportunity to get to the playoffs. But once you are there, you have to show up and play. As I've stated before, I don't think this year's Redskins would have shown up for the playoffs if they had been in Arizona's situation.
Yeah, you get to the playoffs healthy playing non-physical pansies unlike our division which has always been pretty physical especially during the 80's.
Ruhskins 01-20-2009, 03:45 PM Yeah, you get to the playoffs healthy playing non-physical pansies unlike our division which has always been pretty physical especially during the 80's.
I think the biggest advantage of playing in a weak division is being able to get into the playoffs by winning your division with a 9-7 or 8-8 record. Yes being healthy is important, but a tad bit more important is not have to worry about wild card spots.
|