Offensive Report Card (Bucs game)

Pages : 1 2 3 [4] 5 6

CRT3
09-14-2004, 03:40 PM
everyone in a gibbs offense blocks... i saw thrash coles and gardner all throwing down. Were you at the game? If not, how are you able to see that when the TV cameras don't cover the whole field for a running play unless it is a long run. Did they actually pan to Thrash and show him blocking. If they did tell me when so I can rewind my tape and watch. Please do not make things up along the way. He quite frankly disapeared during the game. Not to say he is bad but was MIA.

That Guy
09-14-2004, 04:58 PM
you umm.. caught the first play they replayed about 400 times right? or watched portis during the rest of the game when he was grinding? whats your problem man, jeez.

mizzo skins man
09-14-2004, 05:21 PM
Running game was good. Center QB exchange was very dissapointing.

I thought that Coles was getting raped beyond the 5 yard no touch rule. If your going to say your going to start calling this type of penalty, Then call it on a consistant basis. I watched parts of nearly every game this last weekend, and I think that the NFL is full of sh*t. These receivers were being malled.

CRT3
09-14-2004, 09:17 PM
:food-smil you umm.. caught the first play they replayed about 400 times right? or watched portis during the rest of the game when he was grinding? whats your problem man, jeez. This is my whole point Thrash blocked real well for that 1st play. He was missing in action for the rest of the game. My problem is that you are making qoutes based on Lenny P's article with out really watching the WHOLE game. So if you want to quote like Lenny go to ESPN.com and join his forum there.

SKINSnCANES
09-14-2004, 09:29 PM
We didnt put as many points on the board as we should, the defense kept us in the game. However, for as many times as the offense didnt get it done, they looked as a team the whole. Somethign we havent done in years. It was soooooooo nice to see everyone on the same page. when plays didnt work it was becuase they got stuffed, or teh defense read it correctly,b ut we still followed through with everythign the way it was supposed to be run.

monk81
09-14-2004, 09:30 PM
No jumping off sides for the Dirtbags.....With time the offense will be even better ....I'm sure we will see more of Cooley and a few wrinkles on play calling (and I don't mean on the coaching staff's faces :D ) , and I'm sure Burnell and the receivers will get better with more time together..........things are looking up! You can't argue with 148 yds rushing....although the mixups on the handoff were aggravating..............I gave 'em a B

That Guy
09-15-2004, 06:05 AM
This is my whole point Thrash blocked real well for that 1st play. He was missing in action for the rest of the game. My problem is that you are making qoutes based on Lenny P's article with out really watching the WHOLE game. So if you want to quote like Lenny go to ESPN.com and join his forum there.
except i wasn't quoting LP (who would?), the announcers at the game even said, "look at gardner and coles throwing blocks, everyone in a the gibbs system blocks." or something similiar on one of portis's runs. I'm glad you can tell me where i got my quotes from though ;)

CRT3
09-15-2004, 08:29 AM
except i wasn't quoting LP (who would?), the announcers at the game even said, "look at gardner and coles throwing blocks, everyone in a the gibbs system blocks." or something similiar on one of portis's runs. I'm glad you can tell me where i got my quotes from though ;)
Sorry for mistaken identity there guy. You did not quote Lenny P.

But Thrash was missing in action the whole game except for 1 play. IF we had better run blocking for the game I think you would have seen our avg. run be better then 3 yards a carry. Even Gibbs said the run blocking was not up to snuff. Since our recievers all block they are responsible to. Am I wrong

MTK
09-15-2004, 09:34 AM
In regards to the WR's blocking, unless the system calls for the WR's to sit on their hands during running plays of course they were blocking. How well is the question since it's hard to see them off camera.

Coles, Gardner and Thrash are all good blockers for receivers, so I'm going to go out on a limb and say they did their jobs on sunday.

CRT3, you're asking how we saw the WR's blocking, well, how did you see them not blocking? If you were at the game please disregard my question.

That Guy
09-15-2004, 09:54 AM
But Thrash was missing in action the whole game except for 1 play. IF we had better run blocking for the game I think you would have seen our avg. run be better then 3 yards a carry. Even Gibbs said the run blocking was not up to snuff. Since our recievers all block they are responsible to. Am I wrong

nope, run blocking could definately be better, but our WRs i'd think are actually better blockers than what some other teams have... i didn't see much of thrash besides a couple early plays, but i did see a good number of gardner/coles blocking throughout.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum