redsk1
01-16-2009, 12:31 PM
No, next years class is going to be terrific if we need a QB. Teebow, Bradford, and McCoy means if we suck we might get a shot at one of them. I do not think the Skins are going to resign JC if he doesn't step up his game in '09. I say that since you know JC is going to ask for more $$$$$$$ and unless he is great next season, Vinny and co and going to say bye bye like Casserly did to Gus. Sure JC is better than Gus, but not by a whole lot, with the exception of his TD/INT ratio.
Yea, i was thinking of a way to say this...if JC's sucks next year (which i hope he continues to improve)...there should be some really good QB talent available. Bradford/McCoy are going to be good, i believe.
irish
01-16-2009, 12:45 PM
Its hard to tell what college QBs will be good and which will be busts. I dont think anybody would have predicted such great success for Ryan, Flacco, & Rothlessberger while most thought Russell & Young would be gamers and they have been flops. IMO teams have to look for pro style QBs that played in pro style offenses in college to help maximize the chance for success.
Yellow31
01-16-2009, 01:18 PM
If we drafted Sanchez, the day JC throws his first interception next season, someone will start a thread saying he should be benched in favor of a Brennan-Sanchez rotation. They will form like Voltron and save the Redskins.
Voltron! awesome!
SmootSmack
01-16-2009, 01:51 PM
Its hard to tell what college QBs will be good and which will be busts. I dont think anybody would have predicted such great success for Ryan, Flacco, & Rothlessberger while most thought Russell & Young would be gamers and they have been flops. IMO teams have to look for pro style QBs that played in pro style offenses in college to help maximize the chance for success.
The problem there is upside. Guys who have played in the pro style offense in college generally tend to be as good as they're going to get once they get into the pros. It's the Jeff Tedford theory. Look at some of the "can't miss" prospects he coached-David Carr, Kyle Boller, Joey Harrington, Akili Smith.
itvnetop
01-16-2009, 04:09 PM
SC insiders are now saying that even Mark's agent (or is it his agent-to-be?) even told him to stay in school... even though there's speculation he could go anywhere from 3-9 in the draft, there is a huge possibility he could drop into the second round after combines.
firstdown
01-16-2009, 04:12 PM
Actually, it probably wouldn't take an interception, and probably not even the conclusion of the offseason, for someone to suggest that.
Heck I post that even before training camp.
firstdown
01-16-2009, 04:14 PM
Its hard to tell what college QBs will be good and which will be busts. I dont think anybody would have predicted such great success for Ryan, Flacco, & Rothlessberger while most thought Russell & Young would be gamers and they have been flops. IMO teams have to look for pro style QBs that played in pro style offenses in college to help maximize the chance for success.
I'm not sure if I'd say Young was a flop at this point.
GMScud
01-16-2009, 06:23 PM
I'm not sure if I'd say Young was a flop at this point.
Or JaMarcus Russell for that matter. He's shown flashes despite playing for a laughing stock team.
53Fan
01-16-2009, 09:09 PM
I have a better idea. Why don't we draft some OL that aren't near 40 years of age, and groom Campbell into the signal caller most of us believe he'll become?
Sanchez. Pfft!
Well that's just.......a good idea.
SmootSmack
01-16-2009, 10:24 PM
SC insiders are now saying that even Mark's agent (or is it his agent-to-be?) even told him to stay in school... even though there's speculation he could go anywhere from 3-9 in the draft, there is a huge possibility he could drop into the second round after combines.
Talked to a college scout today who projects him as mid-2nd round pick.