tryfuhl
01-08-2009, 09:55 PM
We saw it in the Colts/Bolts game. The team that wins the coin flip gets to put their offense up against a tired defense and easily win the game. The other teams offense never has a chance to answer.
I've thought about it, looked at how college does it (don't really like that), and decided on a radically new idea: Keep the current NFL format with one major exception. The defense can also win the game if they force a turnover.
Now both sides have a big incentive to play aggresive. The defenses don't have to decide to just play prevent defense and offenses have to think twice before just heaving up the ball and hoping for a lucky pass interference or miracle catch.
What is your idea?
Sorry but a turnover isn't as spectacular as a TD to show victory. I say play another quarter, maybe shortened. I doubt that'd ever happen considering more potential for injuries due to the playing time as well as being tired.
Maybe a kickoff like usual; if the first team gets a TD, the second team has to match that.. same with FGs, but a TD would win over a FG.. if the first team scores and the 2nd team doesnt, game over.. and vice versa
forget that give the ball at the 25 or whatever
tryfuhl
01-08-2009, 09:56 PM
Let both teams have the ball on offense. If the team that wins the toss drives down and scores, the other team should have a chance to match it. If not, game over. So similar to college rules I guess, only none of this starting from the 25 yard line BS. I think that's so dumb.
Although I think Dungy made a good argument for keeping it like it is- he said something along the lines of defense and offense both being equal parts of a football team, and both line up 11 men. If the team that goes on defense first in OT ends up losing, it's becuase their D didn't make the necessary plays. If the team that goes on offense first loses, it's because the O didn't make the necessary plays.
heh, guess i should've read first
I can see Dungy's point, but a 50yd field goal isn't a spectacular drive and the other team should get the chance to do the same
44ever
01-08-2009, 10:04 PM
get rid of overtime all together
Never considered this. Brilliant idea!
tryfuhl
01-08-2009, 10:11 PM
I'm having trouble typing this as my 2 year old daughter just wants to see the top of the page with the four players in skins unifom. She is hooked on the skins stuff and every morning she gets out her skins sweet shirt. So I guess I have to scroll back to the top of the page because she is getting mad.
buy her some bobbleheads or mcfarlane toys
tryfuhl
01-08-2009, 10:12 PM
get rid of overtime all together
what about in the playoffs?
we should consult mcnabb.. he's probably wondering what will happen if they tie.. round robin with the next team
44ever
01-08-2009, 10:18 PM
what about in the playoffs?
we should consult mcnabb.. he's probably wondering what will happen if they tie.. round robin with the next team
what about the playoffs? OT can end in a tie. The 4th qtr. Can end in a tie. With that said all those ties would make the playoffs confusing
tryfuhl
01-08-2009, 10:23 PM
what about the playoffs? OT can end in a tie. The 4th qtr. Can end in a tie. With that said all those ties would make the playoffs confusing
I'm not sure I completely follow... you can evaluate standings with ties
I'm just saying.. if there is no OT in the reg season, what system would he use in the playoffs?
44ever
01-08-2009, 10:53 PM
I'm not sure I completely follow... you can evaluate standings with ties
I'm just saying.. if there is no OT in the reg season, what system would he use in the playoffs?
Oh I see what your saying. Yeah your right about that. I'm retarded.
hooskins
01-09-2009, 03:56 AM
make it exactly like soccer then, one away and one home game and total the aggregate of the scores. Then have a field goal chip-off if tied.
Daseal
01-09-2009, 04:18 AM
Gil Brandt on NFL radio brought up an interesting possibility to NFL overtime today, however I missed part of it. The basic gist was -- make teams score 6 points to win. I'm not sure if it was the first to 6 or win by 6, etc. But the idea is interesting. If a team elects to receive, they have to score a TD on that possession to win the game. A fiend goal won't win the game. It puts pressure on both teams -- personally, I like the idea. The league is slanted towards offenses now days, and one long completion (or PI penalty) puts the other team in FG range.