The Goat
04-26-2009, 10:34 PM
To Schneed10 and CC...are the numbers at the beginning of the thread still accurate? I'm confused because media reports list our cap room at about $5.5 million but it's much higher here. Thanks guys!
Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
[50]
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
The Goat 04-26-2009, 10:34 PM To Schneed10 and CC...are the numbers at the beginning of the thread still accurate? I'm confused because media reports list our cap room at about $5.5 million but it's much higher here. Thanks guys! CrazyCanuck 04-26-2009, 11:55 PM I just did an update and I have us at $8.9M of cap room. Part of that will be used to sign our draft picks. The Goat 04-27-2009, 01:40 AM I just did an update and I have us at $8.9M of cap room. Part of that will be used to sign our draft picks. Very nice...and thanks as always CC. FlaRedskinsFan 04-27-2009, 02:22 PM I just did an update and I have us at $8.9M of cap room. Part of that will be used to sign our draft picks. Nice job !! A few ?? though ... Didn't Daniels sign for less ... although I guess the Wynn signing makes up for your number ... Has Khary Campbell signed his tender ??? Is it really likely that we bring Kendall back ... especially given some of the UDFA signings we've made, and the anticipated progress from Rinehart ?? And I'm really hoping to hear that we signed the LB from Seattle (Hill). HTTR !! Pocket$ $traight 04-27-2009, 09:06 PM Rogers simply isn't making enough to save money when extending him. If he got a Hall-type deal, it would raise his 2009 cap number by 1.0-1.5 million. Cutting Moss would be more of a football decision, based on what he is/isn't needed for. He'll be here until a better option comes along. He won't be here as long as Randle El will be. I thought that the Randle-El/Carter restructurings essentially turned their deals into one year contracts. Meaning they would be gone after this year if they don't produce. If the FO keeps Randle-El (a never been and never will be) and drops Moss, they might as well hire Al Davis to run the team. GTripp0012 04-27-2009, 09:30 PM I thought that the Randle-El/Carter restructurings essentially turned their deals into one year contracts. Meaning they would be gone after this year if they don't produce. If the FO keeps Randle-El (a never been and never will be) and drops Moss, they might as well hire Al Davis to run the team.That's correct essentially, but there is a cost to releasing them none the less. Basically, if there's a cap next year, we can afford to let one, maybe two guys walk. The thing was, if we really weren't considering keeping them, the cheapest way to separate from the contract would have been to not restructure at all, i.e. what we did with Moss. Randle El and Carter and Samuels...I expect them to pick up the options on all of them. If I had to guess one guy who is least likely to be here in 2010, I say Carter, if only because Orakpo should have his role in the defense by then. Pocket$ $traight 04-27-2009, 09:38 PM That's correct essentially, but there is a cost to releasing them none the less. Basically, if there's a cap next year, we can afford to let one, maybe two guys walk. The thing was, if we really weren't considering keeping them, the cheapest way to separate from the contract would have been to not restructure at all, i.e. what we did with Moss. Randle El and Carter and Samuels...I expect them to pick up the options on all of them. If I had to guess one guy who is least likely to be here in 2010, I say Carter, if only because Orakpo should have his role in the defense by then. I think you are right about Carter being a big if in 2011. That being said, purely from a football standpoint I think that the team would be better served keeping him over R-El. But a $7.25 option bonus is pretty steep to keep Carter around. 2010 better be uncapped or we are SCREWED. The defense will be Haynesworth, hall, orakpo and the draft picks. Although Brennan and Chase Daniels may be the Qbs! ha ha ha The Goat 04-27-2009, 09:43 PM I think you are right about Carter being a big if in 2011. That being said, purely from a football standpoint I think that the team would be better served keeping him over R-El. But a $7.25 option bonus is pretty steep to keep Carter around. 2010 better be uncapped or we are SCREWED. The defense will be Haynesworth, hall, orakpo and the draft picks. Although Brennan and Chase Daniels may be the Qbs! ha ha ha The FO was just really smart to keep all our picks for next year...like you said we're gonna need em. Trample the Elderly 04-27-2009, 09:45 PM The FO was just really smart to keep all our picks for next year...like you said we're gonna need em. Damn it Goat don't jinx us. If no one tells them that they've picks for next year they'll not trade them. DoggDayAfternoon 04-27-2009, 09:48 PM The league should be afraid of a uncapped year 2010. That would make the Redskins and Cowboys the Yawkees and BoSox of football. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum