2009 Free Agents [Archive] - Page 56 - Commanders Post at The Warpath


	Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum > 2009 Free Agents PDA 2009 Free Agents Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 [56] 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 The Goat 02-26-2009, 10:01 PM Jason Brown is looking to become one of the highest paid interior linemen in the NFL. Do you really think he's worth that kind of money to play center for us? Personally, no. Sandwiched between big Dock and a resurgent Thomas (or Rinehart or Jansen possibly) Rabach is serviceable. Slingin Sammy 33 02-26-2009, 10:07 PM Jason Brown is looking to become one of the highest paid interior linemen in the NFL. Do you really think he's worth that kind of money to play center for us? He ain't getting Faneca $$$. When he makes a Pro Bowl then he can think about asking for that. If he has unreasonable demands, then pass on him. SmootSmack 02-26-2009, 10:12 PM The interest in both sides, but it's apparently more from Brown's side then the Redskins. If we do sign him, Kendall is basically gone DirtyLandry 02-26-2009, 10:13 PM He ain't getting Faneca $$$. When he makes a Pro Bowl then he can think about asking for that. If he has unreasonable demands, then pass on him. Couldnt agree more. He might not get Faneca $, but who knows? Look at the contract Dockery got from the Bills. Noone expected a slightly-above average interior lineman to fetch that kind of money. The Goat 02-26-2009, 10:16 PM LOL Brown complains about the lack of offense in Baltimore... I know, i know we'll be better this year but really. KLHJ2 02-26-2009, 10:19 PM The interest in both sides, but it's apparently more from Brown's side then the Redskins. If we do sign him, Kendall is basically gone That would not upset me too much because we would be getting younger at that position. On the other hand it doens't do much for the whole picture on the offensive line. We still have questions at RG and RT. We would still need to make at least one more move for a T and move Jansen inside. I know that I am stating the obvious but... That Guy 02-26-2009, 10:21 PM I think one thing we should remember is the history of monster deals... dockery 7 year 49mill -> dumped in two years champ 2billion -> making insane money on one of the leagues worst defenses (And pass defenses). arch/lloyd -> yeah, us too, go figure kearse/etc etc etc lots more, but there seems to be an awful high tendency for the highest paid FAs (that change teams) to end up as wasted money... and because of our cap situation, haynesworth is the all or nothing gamble (whereas, in tampa, they have 50mill after his signing, so its not either/or with them (ie EITHER haynesworth fixes all our problems (offense too) OR it's a mistake to choose him over OL/CB/DE/etc)). if browns coming that means that either hall or haynesworth aren't. we could do dock/brown/willis (OL), crowell (LB), hall or foxworth (CB), nugent (K -> this wont happen) or a punter, then draft a DE keep our DTs, and go OL or LB in the 3rd... we'll see, but honestly, it's safer (much less likely to end up with a bad outcome) short and long term to diversify since we've got a lot of obvious holes. Nflnick11 02-26-2009, 10:23 PM According to profootballtalk.com were supposed to pursue Jason brown... KLHJ2 02-26-2009, 10:25 PM I think one thing we should remember is the history of monster deals... dockery 7 year 49mill -> dumped in two years champ 2billion -> making insane money on one of the leagues worst defenses (And pass defenses). arch/lloyd -> yeah, us too, go figure kearse/etc etc etc lots more, but there seems to be an awful high tendency for the highest paid FAs (that change teams) to end up as wasted money... and because of our cap situation, haynesworth is the all or nothing gamble (whereas, in tampa, they have 50mill after his signing, so its not either/or with them (ie EITHER haynesworth fixes all our problems (offense too) OR it's a mistake to choose him over OL/CB/DE/etc)). if browns coming that means that either hall or haynesworth aren't. we could do dock/brown/willis (OL), crowell (LB), hall or foxworth (CB), nugent (K -> this wont happen) or a punter, then draft a DE keep our DTs, and go OL or LB in the 3rd... we'll see, but honestly, it's safer (much less likely to end up with a bad outcome) short and long term to diversify since we've got a lot of obvious holes. I agree with your thesis but Danny and Sarge are going to do what they want. Right now NFLN still has us as the front runners for AH. I have no reason to not believe them. 44ever 02-26-2009, 10:29 PM I think one thing we should remember is the history of monster deals... dockery 7 year 49mill -> dumped in two years champ 2billion -> making insane money on one of the leagues worst defenses (And pass defenses). arch/lloyd -> yeah, us too, go figure kearse/etc etc etc lots more, but there seems to be an awful high tendency for the highest paid FAs (that change teams) to end up as wasted money... and because of our cap situation, haynesworth is the all or nothing gamble (whereas, in tampa, they have 50mill after his signing, so its not either/or with them (ie EITHER haynesworth fixes all our problems (offense too) OR it's a mistake to choose him over OL/CB/DE/etc)). if browns coming that means that either hall or haynesworth aren't. we could do dock/brown/willis (OL), crowell (LB), hall or foxworth (CB), nugent (K -> this wont happen) or a punter, then draft a DE keep our DTs, and go OL or LB in the 3rd... we'll see, but honestly, it's safer (much less likely to end up with a bad outcome) short and long term to diversify since we've got a lot of obvious holes. Very much agree with you. makes the most logical sence.