Skinny Tee
01-02-2009, 04:46 PM
Wow, what insight. Campbell is slow making reads, slow in his progression, slow release, less than ideal accuracy and isn't 'intense' enough. Is it possible to ban all new Campbell threads that don't put forth original thoughts?
Here some new observations...he's tends to look frozen and seems like he's not going fast at times. His leadership lacks focus and when he throws he comes off as an old sloth.
...wait...those are old observations with new terminology...I guess this doesn't apply sorry.
JC is the 2nd or 3rd least of our problems right now. Once we solidify our line you'll be able to see who is the liability in the offense.
dmek25
01-02-2009, 04:51 PM
i have an idea. lets mega merge all the Campbell threads, and then lock them. whatever needs to be said, has already been said( 1000 times over)
What else do we have to talk about?
The strange thing is, that during the four game winning streak against the Saints, Cards, Cowboys and Eagles he looked great. He was making quick decisions, going through his reads quickly and getting rid of the ball on time. He made me think I had been wrong about him and that Zorn had really turned him into a legitimate NFL QB. Sad thing is, that since that streak he has reverted to looking like the same slow-witted Campbell that so frustrated me up until that point.
He baffles me I must admit.
schndr_tdd
01-02-2009, 05:31 PM
Hes smoking pot! Thats why hes slow.lol.COLT BRENNAN !!!!!At least he will try to throw 25 or 30 touchdown passes......
44ever
01-02-2009, 05:31 PM
What else do we have to talk about?
The strange thing is, that during the four game winning streak against the Saints, Cards, Cowboys and Eagles he looked great. He was making quick decisions, going through his reads quickly and getting rid of the ball on time. He made me think I had been wrong about him and that Zorn had really turned him into a legitimate NFL QB. Sad thing is, that since that streak he has reverted to looking like the same slow-witted Campbell that so frustrated me up until that point.
He baffles me I must admit.
Davy. The way I see it is when Portis got hurt it really changed our O scheme. Not only was he throwing opposing D off with the threat of his running but was adding superior pass protection. He obviously gave JC added confidence and took the pressure off him.
After Portis injuries started we left him in the games but we were not fooling anyone. Opposing D started playing a little deeper and tighter. A weak O line was all that was needed for the decline.
Portis is the only constant. Had he stayed healthy would be talking about other things. IMO.
Nobody beats Dallas and Philly on the road and then losses to the Rams at home and the Bengals.
BigHairedAristocrat
01-02-2009, 05:33 PM
Nobody beats Dallas and Philly on the road and then losses to the Rams at home and the Bengals.
have you watched the skins play? thats been the MO of this team the past few years.
Redskin Warrior
01-02-2009, 05:45 PM
I think the Redskins will let Campbell go and he will be a monster for another team IMO. The talk about him holding the ball too long is bogus. I hardly ever saw a receiver open constantly, and if that wasn't the case the o-line didn't take care of business in pass protection. The QB must depend on his receivers to get open and the line to block. I must agree he was a bit inaccurate this season. Beyond that most thing folks complain about aren't directly Campbell's fault IMO.
44ever
01-02-2009, 05:46 PM
have you watched the skins play? thats been the MO of this team the past few years.
I've been watching them for 35 years. I remember Dallas going 1-15 beating only the Redskins. So I'm well aware of our lopsided play. But the point I was trying to make is there was a definate point of decline and that point started with Portis' decline.
You're not a JC fan I get it.
WaldSkins
01-02-2009, 06:09 PM
I've been watching them for 35 years. I remember Dallas going 1-15 beating only the Redskins. So I'm well aware of our lopsided play. But the point I was trying to make is there was a definate point of decline and that point started with Portis' decline.
You're not a JC fan I get it.
Portis's decline is a direct result of not having a passing game.
44ever
01-02-2009, 06:22 PM
Portis's decline is a direct result of not having a passing game.
That does not explain the first half of the season. Neither does it make any sense. Portis didn't rely on the pass, but his health. Most passing games will not open up until the run is established. Not the other way around.