53Fan
01-02-2009, 01:21 AM
Sorry but I strongly disagree that Wide Receiver is an issue on this team. We have to solid targets in Moss and Cooley, as well as talent coming up in Davis, Thomas, and Kelly. Sure one or two of them might end up as bust but the fact remains that we have two receiving threats off the LOS and in the NFL that's more then enough.
This receiving corps was more then enough during 6-2 when we were running the ball like mad men. It was when the running game broke down where the passing game fell apart. If you remember during those first 8 weeks CP led the league in rushing with 944 yards (on pace for 1,888) and 7 TD's. In the second half of the season he averaged 3.5 ypc with 2 TD's.
So with the running game gone our O-line, who was breaking down from old age at midseason, started to become a liability when teams decided they could unload on our QB and easily get the ball back after 3 and outs.
If anything we need new blood on the O-Line. Even if it means adding a RT, G, and C with our first three picks in the first three rounds (in this scenario we trade back) or better yet we get Jordan Gross in Free agency, draft Duke Robinson in the late first and find a quality center that falls through the cracks like Alex Mack. Maybe get a DT in between. Of course maybe I'm just a dreamer. Anyway we're a team that lives and dies with the running game just like the Vikings. I mean does anyone here think for a second that Tavaris Jackson is half as good as he is without the Vikings running game?
Trust me, O-Line play means much more then Recievers. I mean look at the Cardinals they got two of the best receivers in the league paired with a quality QB in Warner and they barely went 9-7 in possibly the worst division in football. Of course we're not much better going 8-8 but our problems started when the running game went downhill.
Join me brothers in helping the Redskins rebuild a glorious offensive front.
Great points Dirtbag. I also think we should take a hard look at Hixon as I've stated before. But Dirtbag has hit our biggest problem right on the head as far as I'm concerned. Can anyone imagine our Super Bowl teams without the HOGS? We had great Wideouts and a great RB but without the HOGS opening holes and giving our QB's time to throw the ball, does anyone really think we would have won 3 Super Bowls? How would they have done with the line we have now? These guys were so good you could tell the opposition what we were going to do and they couldn't stop it. Ask Riggo how important these guys were. Ask Williams, Theisman, or Rypien what it was like to play behind these guys. We'll get better behind a strong line. Remember Portis saying he would like to see what he could do behind some of the other lines in the league? The line gets better, we get better. Jason needs to step up. It would probably be easier if he didn't have to wonder how the line was going to hold up from play to play.
This receiving corps was more then enough during 6-2 when we were running the ball like mad men. It was when the running game broke down where the passing game fell apart. If you remember during those first 8 weeks CP led the league in rushing with 944 yards (on pace for 1,888) and 7 TD's. In the second half of the season he averaged 3.5 ypc with 2 TD's.
So with the running game gone our O-line, who was breaking down from old age at midseason, started to become a liability when teams decided they could unload on our QB and easily get the ball back after 3 and outs.
If anything we need new blood on the O-Line. Even if it means adding a RT, G, and C with our first three picks in the first three rounds (in this scenario we trade back) or better yet we get Jordan Gross in Free agency, draft Duke Robinson in the late first and find a quality center that falls through the cracks like Alex Mack. Maybe get a DT in between. Of course maybe I'm just a dreamer. Anyway we're a team that lives and dies with the running game just like the Vikings. I mean does anyone here think for a second that Tavaris Jackson is half as good as he is without the Vikings running game?
Trust me, O-Line play means much more then Recievers. I mean look at the Cardinals they got two of the best receivers in the league paired with a quality QB in Warner and they barely went 9-7 in possibly the worst division in football. Of course we're not much better going 8-8 but our problems started when the running game went downhill.
Join me brothers in helping the Redskins rebuild a glorious offensive front.
Great points Dirtbag. I also think we should take a hard look at Hixon as I've stated before. But Dirtbag has hit our biggest problem right on the head as far as I'm concerned. Can anyone imagine our Super Bowl teams without the HOGS? We had great Wideouts and a great RB but without the HOGS opening holes and giving our QB's time to throw the ball, does anyone really think we would have won 3 Super Bowls? How would they have done with the line we have now? These guys were so good you could tell the opposition what we were going to do and they couldn't stop it. Ask Riggo how important these guys were. Ask Williams, Theisman, or Rypien what it was like to play behind these guys. We'll get better behind a strong line. Remember Portis saying he would like to see what he could do behind some of the other lines in the league? The line gets better, we get better. Jason needs to step up. It would probably be easier if he didn't have to wonder how the line was going to hold up from play to play.