Despite win Campbell must go !!!!

Pages : 1 2 3 4 [5]

Sheriff Gonna Getcha
12-21-2008, 11:45 PM
Jason Campbell and Clinton Portis were both highly productive in the first half of the season. They were so productive, in fact, that they were talked about as MVP candidates. In the latter half of the season, Jason has struggled to move the ball through the air and Portis has struggled to move it on the ground. Yet, for some reason, Campbell gets pooped on by the fans, but Portis doesn't. Anyone who loves Portis and dislikes Campbell care to explain?

53Fan
12-21-2008, 11:53 PM
Jason Campbell and Clinton Portis were both highly productive in the first half of the season. They were so productive, in fact, that they were talked about as MVP candidates. In the latter half of the season, Jason has struggled to move the ball through the air and Portis has struggled to move it on the ground. Yet, for some reason, Campbell gets pooped on by the fans, but Portis doesn't. Anyone who loves Portis and dislikes Campbell care to explain?

Oooohhhh. This should be good. :)

The Goat
12-21-2008, 11:59 PM
Jason Campbell and Clinton Portis were both highly productive in the first half of the season. They were so productive, in fact, that they were talked about as MVP candidates. In the latter half of the season, Jason has struggled to move the ball through the air and Portis has struggled to move it on the ground. Yet, for some reason, Campbell gets pooped on by the fans, but Portis doesn't. Anyone who loves Portis and dislikes Campbell care to explain?

Oooohhhh. This should be good. :)

:laughing- Took the words right out of my mouth bro.

over the mountain
12-22-2008, 12:04 AM
Jason Campbell and Clinton Portis were both highly productive in the first half of the season. They were so productive, in fact, that they were talked about as MVP candidates. In the latter half of the season, Jason has struggled to move the ball through the air and Portis has struggled to move it on the ground. Yet, for some reason, Campbell gets pooped on by the fans, but Portis doesn't. Anyone who loves Portis and dislikes Campbell care to explain?

ummm didnt you just close a "portis isnt as good as most think" thread? jus sayin . .

go skins!!

RMSkins
12-22-2008, 12:04 AM
Jason Campbell and Clinton Portis were both highly productive in the first half of the season. They were so productive, in fact, that they were talked about as MVP candidates. In the latter half of the season, Jason has struggled to move the ball through the air and Portis has struggled to move it on the ground. Yet, for some reason, Campbell gets pooped on by the fans, but Portis doesn't. Anyone who loves Portis and dislikes Campbell care to explain?
Sorry SGG,
Portis has proven that he can be a consistently good player in this league, relative to other RB's, I don't think Campbell has proven that yet. Sure, Campbell and Portis have both fallen off in the second half, but I think Portis' injuries are the main reason for his dropoff, for Campbell I just think it's a mixture of bad o-line play, and poor fundamentals.

GMScud
12-22-2008, 12:13 AM
to support JC for the lack of solid play around him is one thing, to believe he will be an elite qb is a whole other story . . this year was really his "report card" year and the seasons almost done, hes lucky he has a year left on his K to show us something hes failed ot show us so far.

unhappy for many years? nah, ill just keep enjoying watch a great D be held back b/c we havent had even an average passing attack in decades . .

go skins!!!


I totally disagree with that. He was thrown into yet another new offense, and the line has been battered and at times flat out bad.

It's pretty much widely known that it takes at least 2 full seasons (Steve Young thinks it takes 3) for a QB to get fully versed and comfortable in a WCO.

The Goat
12-22-2008, 12:16 AM
Plea to the mods: just my opinion but there is some moral hazard for allowing this thread and others like it to drag on and on. Seriously, after three full pages not one reasonable argument for benching/cutting JC. Not one. Instead things tend to unravel into a litany of pointless jib-jabs etc, etc. Just my opinion here. This is a great, correction - fantastic, board w/ intelligent discussion and lots of variety... I just don't think the oft repeated "Send Campbell Packin" thread(s) add much value. And especially when at the end of the day (and season) the majority agree o-line, developing WR talent, and offensive scheme are all bigger issues than JC's intermittent struggles.

MTK
12-22-2008, 12:17 AM
Plea to the mods: just my opinion but there is some moral hazard for allowing this thread and others like it to drag on and on. Seriously, after three full pages not one reasonable argument for benching/cutting JC. Not one. Instead things tend to unravel into a litany of pointless jib-jabs etc, etc. Just my opinion here. This is a great, correction - fantastic, board w/ intelligent discussion and lots of variety... I just don't think the oft repeated "Send Campbell Packin" thread(s) add much value. And especially when at the end of the day (and season) the majority agree o-line, developing WR talent, and offensive scheme are all bigger issues than JC's intermittent struggles.

Good call.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum