Carl Peterson resigns in KC

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4

dmek25
12-16-2008, 07:50 AM
i would take old man Reese, from e.s.p.n before Peterson

redsk1
12-16-2008, 09:42 AM
Peterson, probably not. His resume isn't too bad though. For a 10 year span they were the model franchise. One of the top 5 in the NFL year in and year out.

Probably just misfortune that they never won a SB.

I could live w/ Peterson vs VC.

Joe Kidd
12-16-2008, 09:49 AM
He never even made it to a Super Bowl though, and only 1 championship game appearance. That's pretty ho-hum.

SmootSmack
12-16-2008, 05:45 PM
Peterson, probably not. His resume isn't too bad though. For a 10 year span they were the model franchise. One of the top 5 in the NFL year in and year out.

Probably just misfortune that they never won a SB.

I could live w/ Peterson vs VC.

What 10 years are you talking about?

Defensewins
12-16-2008, 06:31 PM
What 10 years are you talking about?

Not that I want Carl Petersen as our GM, because I do not. I would want someone younger.
But from 1989-1997 KC was consistently a good team. Something Vinny and Snyder have not done in Washington.

KC Season Record

1997 13 3 0 1st
1996 9 7 0 2nd
1995 13 3 0 1st
1994 9 7 0 2nd
1993 11 5 0 1st
1992 10 6 0 2nd
1991 10 6 0 2nd
1990 11 5 0 2nd
1989 8 7 1 2nd

SmootSmack
12-16-2008, 06:37 PM
Not that I want Carl Petersen as our GM, because I do not. I would want someone younger.
But from 1989-1997 KC was consistently a good team. Something Vinny and Snyder have not done in Washington.

KC Season Record

1997 13 3 0 1st
1996 9 7 0 2nd
1995 13 3 0 1st
1994 9 7 0 2nd
1993 11 5 0 1st
1992 10 6 0 2nd
1991 10 6 0 2nd
1990 11 5 0 2nd
1989 8 7 1 2nd

Sure, they had a decent run a decade ago. But I don't know what made them "the model franchise" or one of the top 5 in the NFL

Defensewins
12-16-2008, 06:56 PM
Sure, they had a decent run a decade ago. But I don't know what made them "the model franchise" or one of the top 5 in the NFL

During that period of time during Marty's tenure as Head Coach KC went 104-65-1, that is a strong accomplishment for any team.
During that time they were a top 5 team.
Being a winner for many years is a major accomplishment. While it does not come close to winning a super bowl, you have to give Carp Peterson credit for hiring the coaches and drafting the players that made up that team.

redsk1
12-16-2008, 07:35 PM
Not that I want Carl Petersen as our GM, because I do not. I would want someone younger.
But from 1989-1997 KC was consistently a good team. Something Vinny and Snyder have not done in Washington.

KC Season Record

1997 13 3 0 1st
1996 9 7 0 2nd
1995 13 3 0 1st
1994 9 7 0 2nd
1993 11 5 0 1st
1992 10 6 0 2nd
1991 10 6 0 2nd
1990 11 5 0 2nd
1989 8 7 1 2nd

That's a pretty good run. I would venture to say that record is probably top 5 in the nfl during that period. Granted, no SB's but give him some credit.

Not that i would want Peterson, but it amazes me some would be so quick to say no, yet defend VC and his 8 year track record here.

Defensewins
12-16-2008, 08:00 PM
That's a pretty good run. I would venture to say that record is probably top 5 in the nfl during that period. Granted, no SB's but give him some credit.

Not that i would want Peterson, but it amazes me some would be so quick to say no, yet defend VC and his 8 year track record here.

Exactly my point.
I like that...VC. Varmint Cong. Licensed to kill gophers.

MTK
12-17-2008, 10:44 AM
That's a pretty good run. I would venture to say that record is probably top 5 in the nfl during that period. Granted, no SB's but give him some credit.

Not that i would want Peterson, but it amazes me some would be so quick to say no, yet defend VC and his 8 year track record here.

Regardless of what Vinny has done, I'm just not all that impressed with what Peterson did in his 20 years in KC. One AFC Championship appearance? To me that's pretty easy to say no to.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum