DCPSR Player of the Game

Pages : 1 2 3 [4] 5

MTK
12-01-2008, 12:27 PM
Thanks for proving my point.

vallin21
12-01-2008, 01:22 PM
Hall easily. He should've had 2 picks but Springs got in his way. We need to lock him up next year.

EternalEnigma21
12-01-2008, 01:23 PM
back to point, I voted horton. He played the run extremely well yesterday... and when he blew up a lineman and brandon jacobs at the same time in the backfield it was absolutely beautiful. He's playing some great football. He did take a bad angle on Jacobs but had the sense to re-set and stop him before a first down when jacobs bounced outside once, but he is really strong in run support.

EternalEnigma21
12-01-2008, 01:24 PM
Hall easily. He should've had 2 picks but Springs got in his way. We need to lock him up next year.


I agree that we should sign hall. I'd want to see a clause in a contract about not acting like a total Ftard, but he can still play well, and we actually have a DB who can catch... its nice :P

over the mountain
12-01-2008, 01:51 PM
Hall easily. He should've had 2 picks but Springs got in his way. We need to lock him up next year.

i said this in another thread ill say it here: d hall is not the answer to replacing springs, we should look elsewhere.

in oakland he said he was trying to jump routes to much which may lead to some ints but it also leads to some unnecessary completions. trying to play off a receiver to bait a qb into a throw can be helpful sometimes but it is a "me" attitude not a team first thing. i cant see coach blache teaching this or allowing his players to decide how they should play. when it works great but its one of those things that it'd better work or your ass is grass. kinda like a qb audibling out of an important play; itd better work or else . . .

the PF on hall also showed that he is a hot head who loses his cool when hes made to look stupid and puts personal satisfaction over team success. it seems every week now we have an unnecessary PF, our players need to focus.

d hall is the player we were told he was when he came here, dont let the ints fool you, he is a liability and doesnt play redskins brand football.

mredskins
12-01-2008, 02:12 PM
d hall is the player we were told he was when he came here, dont let the ints fool you, he is a liability and doesnt play redskins brand football.

I agree the guy plays to win, Redskin brand football is all about losing. Cut the guy.

SBXVII
12-01-2008, 02:32 PM
How the fuck do you give a game ball to a losing team????? This is retarded.

Thank you ...I was kinda confused also. Why are we doing this poll. maybe it should read who should we keep next year or who showed up to play?

over the mountain
12-01-2008, 02:55 PM
d hall is the player we were told he was when he came here, dont let the ints fool you, he is a liability and doesnt play redskins brand football.

I agree the guy plays to win, Redskin brand football is all about losing. Cut the guy.

yeah i forgot hes been on some many winning teams before he came here and we didnt start winning games until he got here . . . nah maybe your right, with some many other problems to talk about maybe i should hold off on my personal opinion of hall until the end of the year since he is making nfl chump change for his services this year. i just dont want to see him get a fat contract because we have been interception deprived for years and he plays off receivers and can catch poorly thrown balls.

but your right, given his K amount this year and few games hes played i should probaly hold off on bashing him until atleast the off season.

vallin21
12-01-2008, 03:12 PM
i said this in another thread ill say it here: d hall is not the answer to replacing springs, we should look elsewhere.

in oakland he said he was trying to jump routes to much which may lead to some ints but it also leads to some unnecessary completions. trying to play off a receiver to bait a qb into a throw can be helpful sometimes but it is a "me" attitude not a team first thing. i cant see coach blache teaching this or allowing his players to decide how they should play. when it works great but its one of those things that it'd better work or your ass is grass. kinda like a qb audibling out of an important play; itd better work or else . . .

the PF on hall also showed that he is a hot head who loses his cool when hes made to look stupid and puts personal satisfaction over team success. it seems every week now we have an unnecessary PF, our players need to focus.

d hall is the player we were told he was when he came here, dont let the ints fool you, he is a liability and doesnt play redskins brand football.
Define redskins brand football. If you want a 32 year old running into your teamates when they have clean ints and getting injured because he got "kicked in the calf" then go ahead and watch your "Redskin brand football" I just don't see the "me" attitude in Hall while he's been with the redskins.

over the mountain
12-01-2008, 04:02 PM
have we fallen in love with d hall already?

he did a great job of hanging onto the ball yesterday but the fact is he was behind the receiver and the receiver had to not catch the ball for it even to get to him . . . yes he gets credit for playing tight coverage there but if the receiver had been looking for the ball and caught it it would be a reception. (haha obviously)

his other ints were poorly thrown balls where he was behind/off the receiver either in zone or poor man play.

i dont think he would be a good no 2 corner compliment to carlos or worth the money he wants next year.

good thing we didnt give JC "eli" type money 6 weeks in when alot of people were talking about a K extension.

seems im the only one not feelin hall as a long term member to our franchise so ill shut up about it. a few ints and we overlook or discount his bad plays . . . .

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum