JudgeJebus
09-08-2004, 02:09 PM
The official depth chart has now been posted on redskins.com.
http://www.redskins.com/team/depthchart.jsp
No surprises, except maybe that Thrash and Jacobs are ahead of McCants. Cooley is also listed awfully low, especially as there's talk of him starting.
Krills
09-08-2004, 02:32 PM
I think the Cooley thing might be a mistake. I hope it is anyway
bedlamVR
09-08-2004, 02:40 PM
Also has Nobel ahead of Big Joe yet the WP reports Nobel likley as a back up.
SKINSnCANES
09-08-2004, 03:08 PM
Im pretty sure I heard the Cooley was starting to, weird. Im sure he'll get plenty of snaps either way, even if he isnt the official starter to get his name called. Im hoping for great things out of him.
Big C
09-08-2004, 04:04 PM
both the washington post and redskins.com had articles sayin cooley was gonna be the starter
PSUskinsfan11
09-08-2004, 04:29 PM
I am blown away that McCants is the 5th WR. There were reports that we might trade Gardner because McCants was good enough to be the second WR. What the hell happened at camp??? He looked good in preseason and he really impressed me last year and now he is behind JAMES THRASH?!?!?!?!
cpayne5
09-08-2004, 05:02 PM
We'll see the *official* depth chart sunday during the game.
It also states that James Thrash has chosen #83.
jrocx69
09-08-2004, 05:04 PM
I am blown away that McCants is the 5th WR. There were reports that we might trade Gardner because McCants was good enough to be the second WR. What the hell happened at camp??? He looked good in preseason and he really impressed me last year and now he is behind JAMES THRASH?!?!?!?!
why you knocking thrash? much more speed to stretch the d, and as well has alot of experience being a starter. i also think that the reports of the "eagles wrs stink" was to hide how bad mcnabb is as a passer. some of it lied with the wr's, but no where near as much as reported.
Big C
09-08-2004, 05:36 PM
lets face it tho, thrash is not a #1 reciever, hes a decent #2, and a very good #3
PSUskinsfan11
09-08-2004, 06:56 PM
why you knocking thrash? much more speed to stretch the d, and as well has alot of experience being a starter. i also think that the reports of the "eagles wrs stink" was to hide how bad mcnabb is as a passer. some of it lied with the wr's, but no where near as much as reported.
are you serious. Thrash is not a starter. He could not start for us the first time he was here and he won't start now. McNabb, as much as I hate him, is not a bad passer. He is surrounded by the worst group of WR's in the league. Thrash was a number 1 there and he shouldn't even be 4th here. He does have speed so he can return our punts. If speed made you a good WR we would still have Russel on the team.
F.Y.I.
McCants our 3rd WR last year......360 yards 6 td's 13.3 avg. 7 catches over 20 yards
Thrash as the Eagles starter.....558 yards 1td 11.4 avg 5 catches over 20 yards