Why Did We Draft Fred Davis?

Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

SouperMeister
11-17-2008, 01:20 AM
So let's see if I have this right - Dallas trusts their backup TE drafted in the 2nd round to make a game winning catch in the 4th quarter of a key division game, but our TE drafted in the 2nd round can't get on the field for the Skins, who have scored a grand total of 16 points and one TD at home the past two weeks? We hear what a stud Davis looks like in practice, but Zorn can't find a place for him to impact the game on Sunday? I was vehemently against the Davis pick when there were more pressing depth issues on the O and D lines. But now that we have him, at least let the guy make an impact on Sunday. This is a completely wasted pick for this season if Zorn continues to leave Davis rotting on the pine. For that matter, is Devin Thomas only capable of running 5 yard curls? Until this offense gets something in the passing game from somebody not named Cooley or Moss, it is a very predictable passing attack to gameplan against.

Beemnseven
11-17-2008, 01:22 AM
At the time, I thought it was a good pick for depth behind Chris Cooley if we ever lost him to injury.

But that's a steep price to pay for a backup tight end. Especially when your O-line has gotten old in the span of about 3 weeks.

JWsleep
11-17-2008, 01:25 AM
Prediction: he's going to take Yoder's place next season.

Zorn has been slow to bring the rookies along. But that's fine, IMO. In this offense, they need to be very precise and they aren't there yet. Plus, all three have been hurt, delaying there progress. Don't give up on them yet!

JWsleep
11-17-2008, 01:27 AM
On Devin Thomas: according to Zorn in his presser, on a play where JC threw to Cooley underneath after getting flushed from the pocket, DT was wide open for a TD if the pocket holds. So Devin is going deep. You set that up by running curls and outs. Then you play action and run a double move. And we did that. And the CB bit on the fake and Devin was open. But the protection broke down. JC scrambled and hit Cooley. But that shows how weak pass pro can make EVERYTHING look bad.

Ruhskins
11-17-2008, 01:29 AM
Why did we draft Malcolm Kelly for him to be hurt all season? Who knows. I wonder if any rookie o-lineman would have worked out. I do know that I was wrong in thinking that we needed a free agent WR. We needed a free agent lineman, since that seems to be the cause of a lot of our troubles lately.

drew54
11-17-2008, 01:33 AM
2009 #1 pick should be OLine.

DynamiteRave
11-17-2008, 01:33 AM
Prediction: he's going to take Yoder's place next season.

Zorn has been slow to bring the rookies along. But that's fine, IMO. In this offense, they need to be very precise and they aren't there yet. Plus, all three have been hurt, delaying there progress. Don't give up on them yet!

Sad. I like Yoder. The guy is money down on the goal line.

JWsleep
11-17-2008, 01:34 AM
Sad. I like Yoder. The guy is money down on the goal line.

Wait until you see Davis unleashed!!!! (I really hope!)

SmootSmack
11-17-2008, 01:38 AM
We had threads like this on Rogers, Campbell, and I think McIntosh as well.

SouperMeister
11-17-2008, 01:55 AM
We had threads like this on Rogers, Campbell, and I think McIntosh as well.My point is that sometimes you should veer from your draft board and go for positional needs. We had already locked Cooley up long term, so TE wasn't a great need. Cooley has never missed a game due to injury, so you're effectively drafting a #2 TE with a 2nd round pick. If you're not going to even try to get Davis on the field in 2 TE packages, then it's pretty clear that drafting for other positional needs would be helping the team more at this point.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum