Why Did We Draft Fred Davis?

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Bushead
11-18-2008, 10:37 PM
I just don't get it. We have seen what happens when we draft all the free agents. Some come in and make an impact right away, some do nothing, and some take a while to get going.

Now everyone was happy with having all the draft picks and being able to "build through the draft" but you guys want to see impact players that change the entire game.

I say give it some time. Hindsight is 20/20. But drafting any o-lineman in the second round would have mean that it would have taking a few years for them to come into their own (Derrick Dockery).

I hope we have some patience after next weeks win.

cdskins26
11-19-2008, 10:19 AM
I thought we were trying to get rid of cooley because of money initially, but now i am scratching my head about this one.

A10sROCK
11-19-2008, 03:20 PM
I think his problem is learning the playbook.

Fact is that none of the rookie receivers has done much so far this season. Most WR/TE don't do too good the first year - however even this yr has been underwhelming for our Redskin rookie receivers.

Then you've got a seventh rounder like Chris Horton lighting the place up. I wonder who gets the big payday a couple years from now!

We could have use at least one OL or DL instead of three WR/TE in the draft!

DIRTEE
11-19-2008, 05:08 PM
I think we are fine. The only thing that remained the same from last year was the running game and the defense. And everthing that is new, seems to be giving us problems. I can see us with a new receiver coach next year, maybe Taylor Jacobs. Now, honestly, Zorn just wants Davis to be accountable for his play. Trust wasn't the right term to use, but i'm sure its going to get some production.

CRedskinsRule
11-19-2008, 06:48 PM
We drafted davis, because we did not want a player that could help us now like Desean Jackson.

geez, that's getting old. if we had drafted Royal or Jackson, they would have sat on the bench just like thomas and kelly. they are good on teams that don't already have a starting lineup of WR's but we did, and do, and until the rookies earn their pay they will be slower on the field.

SmootSmack
11-19-2008, 07:32 PM
geez, that's getting old. if we had drafted Royal or Jackson, they would have sat on the bench just like thomas and kelly. they are good on teams that don't already have a starting lineup of WR's but we did, and do, and until the rookies earn their pay they will be slower on the field.

Plus we already have a "DeSean Jackson"...his name is Santana Moss

GTripp0012
11-19-2008, 08:28 PM
My girlfriends from Ohio. If I lived there I'd want to leave too.Good joke I heard today:

Michigan had to cancel their trip to Ohio State this week. Why? Because they couldn't get past Toledo!

53Fan
11-19-2008, 09:37 PM
:silly: I'm surprised you find that funny living in Michigan GTripp.

Warren85Ellard
11-19-2008, 10:55 PM
Dude, you are an extremely extreme fan.

Not to start an ass-kissing contest, but GTripp knows his shit! Keep dropping knowledge on us man!!

Skins4L
11-20-2008, 07:04 AM
ok fake scenario....lets just say Cooley goes down with an injury (*knocking on wood). TADAAA! We have Fred Davis. but we should get some real playing time and maybe net us a couple catches before that could happen just to break em in.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum