Redskins Offense: What's the Problem?

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14

DarkKnight
11-17-2008, 11:16 PM
Offensive line is the problem. They are good in run blocking, but the pass blocking is pretty bad...mostly Rabach and Jansen

Rabach is garbage, and gets killed up the middle, Jansen best days are behind him, and there is not solid back up for this except, draft well, .....

GTripp0012
11-17-2008, 11:18 PM
I thought I posted this before but apparently I closed my browser before I had a chance.

Anyway I feel like the problem with the all the sacks and the problem with the offense in general is the fact that we're barely trying to push the ball downfield. I realize Zorn might have a big plan and the WCO is predicated on the short pass, but how many times did we really try to throw deep last night. Once or twice, maybe more?

If my theory is correct the last few teams we've played have no respect for our deep ball. Even though we have Moss and a cannon arm in Campbell. It seems Zorn has become content with just running slants, curls, and screens. What I want to know is wheres the posts, corners, hitch n' go's (in theory a great route considering what we're doing now)? In the meantime opponents seem to feel pretty comfortable running suicide blitzes knowing we're probably going to try something short rather then making them pay deep with Cooley or Moss. In the meantime the running game suffers because teams have realzied we're not going deep and as an extension of that we can't run play action, which seems to be Zorn's prefence when it comes to going long.

In conclusion I think the key to future success is incorporating the deep ball to push defenses back. Either way I want to see the offense that beat the Cowboys, Saints, and Cardinals. Not the monstrosety (SP?) that we saw on opening night against the Giants.Those routes were used all the time against Detroit, because we felt we could handle them upfront. Against Pittsburgh and Dallas, we've been incredibly conservative, and probably for good reason. Without Jason Campbell, this team is a coin flip to beat SEA and SF, so we have to make sure he takes fewer hits than he has the last two games.

Play action, I think, is a good middle ground for this team. Teams respect the run and if you can get the ends to crash down, we can still protect Campbell. I think we have to live off play action right now. Zorn's been putting more of it in, but not enough, IMO.

SBXVII
11-17-2008, 11:28 PM
The problem is....the TTB. lol. He's not carrying his fair load.

Beemnseven
11-18-2008, 08:33 AM
With JC always being told to check down, I wonder if he's doing it too much. I don't buy this, never having time to go long stuff. The line is not blocking well, I DEFINITELY agree with that, but it's a lot harder to block when you wait to throw long until later in the game because you have to because you're behind and nothing else is working. If you start throwing long occasionally early in the game, the "D" does'nt start stacking the line right away which opens up the run and shorter passes. If people on this board are saying we don't throw long because we don't have time, I would imagine DC's are saying the same thing. Makes it pretty easy to gameplan us. Whether it's completed or not you have to take a shot and you have to do it earlier than we've been doing it. Our offense is pretty easy to read right now. The Redskins don't go long. It's kinda like the lottery, you can't win if you don't play. Well you can't complete a long pass if you don't THROW a long pass. Give your quarterback and receivers a chance to make a play. We're taking that away ourselves by not attempting it. And I don't mean calling it then checking down. Throw the damn ball. That's what sends the message.

They don't have to stack the line in order to get pressure on Campbell. They can do it with just four down linemen. Hell, Pittsburgh did it with just three.

It doesn't matter how early in the game you start to throw it downfield. I've said it over and over -- Campbell is running for his life before the receivers have a chance to get deep.

Our line has allowed 14 sacks in the last three games, and when Campbell isn't sacked, he's being pelted, knocked down, and hit on just about every other throw. The line play is just plain bad. And that will cause everything on offense to stagnate.

Beemnseven
11-18-2008, 08:40 AM
I've been thinking about this for a while, and I know im going to get killed for saying it but...... Maybe Joe Bugel needs to go, not now today, but after this season. for 4-5 years it has been said that the strength of this team is the O-line, but pass protection has been an issue since hes been here.
Look how Russ Grim built the O-line in Arizona and Pittsburg for that matter. Kurt Warner has all day to throw the ball, JC has 2 maybe 3 seconds, thats just crap. Maybe its technique, I just cant believe that this issue cant or hasnt been resolved. The SKins have paid a hefty price for this line and at this point its one of the worst in pass blocking.

Why is it Joe Bugel's fault? Do you think he's not coaching them right anymore?

Isn't it more reasonable to see that we have an old offensive line that hasn't been built for the future, with aging players whose performances are deteriorating to their natural state? There's a very fine line between experienced, veteran leadership and old guys who either struggle to stay healthy or just can't play anymore.

MTK
11-18-2008, 09:36 AM
Why is it Joe Bugel's fault? Do you think he's not coaching them right anymore?

Isn't it more reasonable to see that we have an old offensive line that hasn't been built for the future, with aging players whose performances are deteriorating to their natural state? There's a very fine line between experienced, veteran leadership and old guys who either struggle to stay healthy or just can't play anymore.

There's always gotta be a fall guy, and for some reason people would rather look at the coaches first than the talent on the field.

irish
11-18-2008, 09:50 AM
Rabach is garbage, and gets killed up the middle, Jansen best days are behind him, and there is not solid back up for this except, draft well, .....

I think they have to play Heyer the rest of the way if for nothing else to see if he can really play in this league. Heyer may or may not be the future and they gotta see which one it is.

redskinsgirl
11-18-2008, 10:22 AM
I'm not saying that Big Ben has had a flawless season by any scope of the imagination but what I am contending is that he looks more poised in the face of heavy pressure. He looks through the rush and is still finding Holmes running out routes and and Ward over the middle for 10 to 12 yard chunks with relative accuracy. Would I rather have Ben than JC at this point in the season. Absolutely. The game isn't played in the stat column.

I know the game isn't played in the stat column. My point was Big Ben isn't haven't a good season either. It hard to really compared Big Ben's poise to JC's poise when Ben has been playing longer, has a ring, and has Ward and Holmes as receivers. If JC had Holmes playing along side Moss you wouldn't even doubt JC's abiliity. Big Ben does move around a little better than JC, but JC seems to get rid of the ball a little quicker the Ben this year. Do you really think Big Ben would have done better than JC against a defense that is #1 against the pass and rushing the QB??? Harrison & Co. even had a veteran QB like McNabb looking like a rookie.

BrunellMVP?
11-18-2008, 10:26 AM
there are 5 teams with fewer points scored than us:

det (0-10), STL (2,8), Cinci (1,8,1), Oak (2,8) and KC (1,9)

combined record (6,43,1)

irish
11-18-2008, 11:17 AM
there are 5 teams with fewer points scored than us:

det (0-10), STL (2,8), Cinci (1,8,1), Oak (2,8) and KC (1,9)

combined record (6,43,1)

I think that Det has more TDs but less points than the Skins. If memory serves, the Skins havent cracked 30 yet this season.

This is not a good group for the Skins to be in.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum