Michael Irvin's Three Greatest WRs

Pages : 1 [2] 3

ChounsMan
08-31-2004, 01:46 PM
So I guess just because Henry Ellard didn't win a SB he's not worthy to be in the elite 3 even though he was one of the best route runners to ever rocket off the line.

Reed's postseason numbers are really good compared to Ellard, but I think Ellard was a better route runner.

Reed's Postseason Stats:

Postseason data
Please read this fine print before using this data or sending questions or corrections.

Year Opp Result | RSH YD TD | REC YD TD
---------------------+-----------------+-----------------
1988 hou W,17-10 | 1 -1 0 | 6 91 0
1988 cin L,10-21 | 0 0 0 | 5 55 1
1989 cle L,30-34 | 0 0 0 | 6 115 1
1990 mia W,44-34 | 0 0 0 | 4 123 2
1990 rai W,51-3 | 0 0 0 | 2 29 0
*1990 nyg L,19-20 | 0 0 0 | 8 62 0
1991 kan W,37-14 | 1 6 0 | 4 100 2
1991 den W,10-7 | 1 16 0 | 2 19 0
*1991 was L,24-37 | 0 0 0 | 5 34 0
1992 hou W,41-38 | 0 0 0 | 8 136 3
1992 pit W,24-3 | 1 -8 0 | 0 0 0
1992 mia W,29-10 | 2 6 0 | 3 25 0
*1992 dal L,17-52 | 0 0 0 | 8 152 0
1993 rai W,29-23 | 0 0 0 | 4 53 0
1993 kan W,30-13 | 1 8 0 | 4 49 0
*1993 dal L,13-30 | 0 0 0 | 6 75 0
1995 pit L,21-40 | 0 0 0 | 2 20 0
1996 jax L,27-30 | 0 0 0 | 3 32 0
1998 mia L,17-24 | 0 0 0 | 5 60 0
---------------------+-----------------+-----------------
TOTAL | 7 27 0 | 85 1230 9


Ellard's Postseason Stats:

Postseason data
Please read this fine print before using this data or sending questions or corrections.

Year Opp Result | RSH YD TD | REC YD TD
---------------------+-----------------+-----------------
1983 dal W,24-17 | 0 0 0 | 1 22 0
1983 was L,7-51 | 0 0 0 | 3 39 0
1984 nyg L,13-16 | 0 0 0 | 2 22 0
1985 dal W,20-0 | 0 0 0 | 2 33 0
1985 chi L,0-24 | 0 0 0 | 1 5 0
1986 was L,7-19 | 0 0 0 | 1 14 0
1988 min L,17-28 | 1 2 0 | 4 54 0
1989 phi W,21-7 | 0 0 0 | 4 87 1
1989 nyg W,19-13 | 0 0 0 | 8 125 0
1989 sfo L,3-30 | 0 0 0 | 2 18 0
---------------------+-----------------+-----------------
TOTAL | 1 2 0 | 28 419 1

Drift Reality
08-31-2004, 03:11 PM
Actually, I don't think we can lump pot and crack into the collective heading of "drugs." This is apples and oranges. Cocaine is a narcotic stimulant and pot is a low-level hallucinogen.

The active ingredients in Pot have not been scientifically proven to damage brain cells to the extent that ethanol (in alcohol) has; and probably both alcohol and marijuana do far less damage to someone's brain than crack.

Basically, I think doing crack for a sustained amount of time would lead to idiotic remarks that come out of Michael Irvin's mouth with regularity; on the other hand, a patient who takes marijuana in a therapeutic manner would probably have no serious impairments to his/her judgment and would realize that the top three receivers of all time are:

1. Jerry Rice
2. Lynn Swann
3. Charley Taylor

CRT3
08-31-2004, 03:47 PM
Actually, I don't think we can lump pot and crack into the collective heading of "drugs." This is apples and oranges. Cocaine is a narcotic stimulant and pot is a low-level hallucinogen.

The active ingredients in Pot have not been scientifically proven to damage brain cells to the extent that ethanol (in alcohol) has; and probably both alcohol and marijuana do far less damage to someone's brain than crack.

Basically, I think doing crack for a sustained amount of time would lead to idiotic remarks that come out of Michael Irvin's mouth with regularity; on the other hand, a patient who takes marijuana in a therapeutic manner would probably have no serious impairments to his/her judgment and would realize that the top three receivers of all time are:

1. Jerry Rice
2. Lynn Swann
3. Charley Taylor
Very well put I fully agree with you.

Eelch please don't tell me to keep it on the QT. This is reality man and it is in fact only a $100.00 fine in the state of MD. So I don't think we have to worry about the cuffs. I also don't think it is right to make assumptions on peoples lives like Mr. Irvin. He did get busted in the past but it is unfair for us to judge what we don't know. Stick to disagreeing with his picks and not making judgments where you have no factual knowledge. Who would be your picks for top 3 recievers? Or maybe just pick the 3 biggest egos in football

EEich
08-31-2004, 04:06 PM
Plenty of people express opinions based on assumptions on this website, and I reserve the right to do so in the future. My assumption was only about Mr. Irving's past use in this case and I believe it was warranted.

I didn't say that I wouldn't be smoking if I was in you're wife's place... I just wouldn't want my spouse posting about it on a public board. I really hope your wife does well. I have some close friends going through the same thing... and I know how difficult it has been for them.

Very well put I fully agree with you.

Eelch please don't tell me to keep it on the QT. This is reality man and it is in fact only a $100.00 fine in the state of MD. So I don't think we have to worry about the cuffs. I also don't think it is right to make assumptions on peoples lives like Mr. Irvin. He did get busted in the past but it is unfair for us to judge what we don't know. Stick to disagreeing with his picks and not making judgments where you have no factual knowledge. Who would be your picks for top 3 recievers? Or maybe just pick the 3 biggest egos in football

jbcjr14
08-31-2004, 04:09 PM
Very well put I fully agree with you.

Eelch please don't tell me to keep it on the QT. This is reality man and it is in fact only a $100.00 fine in the state of MD. So I don't think we have to worry about the cuffs. I also don't think it is right to make assumptions on peoples lives like Mr. Irvin. He did get busted in the past but it is unfair for us to judge what we don't know. Stick to disagreeing with his picks and not making judgments where you have no factual knowledge. Who would be your picks for top 3 recievers? Or maybe just pick the 3 biggest egos in football

QT, the "reality" of it is that he was/is a habitual crack/coke user and has been busted on more than one occassion. Once a user always an abuser, especially for that idiot. I don't know if he is a user now, but just like an alcoholic, they are always an alcoholic and are never cured of the disease. This is my opinion, and I am entitled to think that drugs cause him to say stupid garbage at times...that is my constitutional right.

jbcjr14
08-31-2004, 04:10 PM
Very well put I fully agree with you.

Eelch please don't tell me to keep it on the QT. This is reality man and it is in fact only a $100.00 fine in the state of MD. So I don't think we have to worry about the cuffs. I also don't think it is right to make assumptions on peoples lives like Mr. Irvin. He did get busted in the past but it is unfair for us to judge what we don't know. Stick to disagreeing with his picks and not making judgments where you have no factual knowledge. Who would be your picks for top 3 recievers? Or maybe just pick the 3 biggest egos in football

QT, the "reality" of it is that he was/is a habitual crack/coke user and has been busted on more than one occassion. Once a user always an abuser, especially for that idiot. I don't know if he is a user now, but just like an alcoholic, they are always an alcoholic and are never cured of the disease. This is my opinion, and I am entitled to think that drugs cause him to say stupid garbage at times...that is my constitutional right.

1. Largent
2. Monk
3. Rice

EEich
08-31-2004, 04:15 PM
By the way... here's my list of all time WRs:
Jerry Rice
Art Monk
Steve Largent

And my list of all time egos:
Deion Sanders
Jeff George
Michael Irving

CRT3
08-31-2004, 04:43 PM
QT, the "reality" of it is that he was/is a habitual crack/coke user and has been busted on more than one occassion. Once a user always an abuser, especially for that idiot. I don't know if he is a user now, but just like an alcoholic, they are always an alcoholic and are never cured of the disease. This is my opinion, and I am entitled to think that drugs cause him to say stupid garbage at times...that is my constitutional right.

1. Largent
2. Monk
3. Rice
OK

But can you guys in Florida at least correctly punch your ballots this year. Its my constitutional right to make sure all votes are counted.

MTK
08-31-2004, 04:46 PM
Or can they at least be counted correctly this time around?

Something tells me Florida is going to be a mess again this Nov.

SmootSmack
08-31-2004, 04:48 PM
CRT3: I am very sorry to hear about your wife and pray that she gets better very soon. I think and hope that everybody else here wishes the same regardless of their opinion of medicinal marijuana.

Drift Reality: Lynn Swann #2? You'll have to explain that one to me. I'm too young to remember his career but his stats don't impress me enough to be number 2. Is it because of his big game performances?

JBCJR14: Jerry Rice #3? That's something you don't see too often. Why not #1?

My top 3:

Rice
Largent
Harrison

also receiving votes: Carter, Lofton

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum