sandtrapjack
09-23-2008, 12:16 PM
If our offense can keep the ball for some long drives and keep the defense fresh we have a shot, but we have to play a perfect game.
That is the key to a Redskins win right there. It will come down to the Time of Possesion battle.
If the Redskins are able to sustain long offensive drives throughout the game, it accomplished two things.
1. Most importantly, it keeps the Dallas offense off the field and limits thier number of possesions.
2. It will keep the Dallas defense on the field and they will get tired around the middle of the 3rd quarter and Portis and Betts can take over.
BleedBurgundy
09-23-2008, 12:28 PM
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2007-8/1275969/toromo.jpg
sandtrapjack
09-23-2008, 12:35 PM
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2007-8/1275969/toromo.jpg
Cute. But aren't you going to feel a little silly if the Cowboys win and a couple of "Brokeback Mountain" players beat you?
BleedBurgundy
09-23-2008, 12:36 PM
Feeling silly is for gay cowboys.
WillH
09-23-2008, 12:46 PM
That could work, but do the math here. You are talking about blitzing, which means sending extra LB's (meaning those LB's are not in coverage), then double-coverage on TO, that means a DB and a safety on one guy, that leaves a CB and safety for the other WR's on the field. And with the LB's blitzing and your DB's and safeties occupied that will leave either Witten or Crayton or Austin in man coverage, which is a match-up QB's look for. I am not even going to mention spreading the defense out by putting Felix Jones in motion and in a pass pattern.
What you are talking about is exactly what the Packers did on defense and they got beat. You send those LB's in on a blitz from different angles, then the middle of the field is open and Witten will have a feast.
And that is the magic of having a WR like Owens, he demands so much attention from the defense it opens up other opportunities for other players on offense by drawing the coverage away from them. This is why I have always said that T.O. does not need 7 catches and 100+ yards to be a factor in the game. Just his presence on the field is enough.
I'm not sure we need to double cover T.O. I think Springs is up for the challenge.
sandtrapjack
09-23-2008, 12:48 PM
I'm not sure we need to double cover T.O. I think Springs is up for the challenge.
Didn't Owens get 4 TD's in one game against the Redskins the last time they tried that?
WillH
09-23-2008, 01:08 PM
Spring looks better then he has in years. You can talk all you want, but we'll see if T.O. does s&@# against him this year.
Slingin Sammy 33
09-23-2008, 01:17 PM
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2007-8/1275969/toromo.jpg
:lol:
53Fan
09-23-2008, 01:31 PM
A little like the pot calling the kettle black. Dallas secondary had one HALF of a bad game against the Eagles. The second half of that game the Eagles only managed 7 points and McNabb was sacked 4 times due to coverage.
Rodgers was sacked 5 times last night due to coverage sacks.
And the Redskins secondary is ONLY allowing 10 yards less per game in the air than the Dallas secondary. Not to mention that you are facing the #1 offense in the league next Sunday.
Washington will not win on Sunday.
For those of you who do not understand "cowboyese", let me interpret. Blah..bblah.. bblah ..blah ..blah.
53Fan
09-23-2008, 05:31 PM
Feeling silly is for gay cowboys.
ZZZZIIIIINNNNNGGGG! :spank: :smashfrea :boxing: :FIREdevil :laughing2 :food-smil