loveskinsinwv
09-05-2008, 06:54 PM
Need Some Info On The Rule...i Know For One Thing About The Catch The Whistle Was Blown To Soon I Assume..but He Was Not Down By Contact When He Made The Catch If I Seen It Correctly..it Should Have Been A Td..madden And Them Didn't Cover It Enough..
Skins_FanFL
09-05-2008, 07:25 PM
Should have been a catch. He was hit, then gained possession, and was not touched. Inadvertant whistle killed the play.
Down or no, it was a HELL of a catch
Boston Brave
09-05-2008, 08:19 PM
Great play, but so unusual it threw everyone off, except Santana.
steveo395
09-05-2008, 09:42 PM
The play should not have been stopped. He was never touched after he gained possession
53Fan
09-05-2008, 11:22 PM
Heads up play by Santana. The officials screwed up.....again.
Darrell_Green_28
09-05-2008, 11:47 PM
If the ball was still not in possession and still moving around and not touch the ground , The whistle should not have been blown. would have probably been a momentum changing play had the whistle not been blown...
Also the PI on Smoot was bogus.. should have been Offensive PI... he pushed Smoot down first..
htownskinfan
09-06-2008, 12:56 AM
how about the Moss lets give up on the play no catch,2 games in a row now he's given up on plays and cost us
Ruhskins
09-06-2008, 01:43 AM
David Tyree may have caught the ball with his helmet, but Santana caught the ball with his nuts. LOL. He still should have caught all those other balls he dropped though.
53Fan
09-06-2008, 02:35 AM
David Tyree may have caught the ball with his helmet, but Santana caught the ball with his nuts. LOL. He still should have caught all those other balls he dropped though.
I think Santana's nuts will make the pro bowl this year.