Mattyk72 presents: The Warpath Zornometer Poll™

I'm gonna go with 3, the only thing keeping me from a 4 is Spurrier, he still haunts my dreams. Everytime I see the 70th Anniversary uniforms I think, Trung Canidate, Matt Bowen, and cutting Stephen Davis.

Wow...that's a HUGE jump in only 1 PRESEASON game difference. Not really convicted in your opinion huh?

I'm not taking this poll thing very seriously, as you can tell... it's just entertainment at this point.

Didn't Spurrier go undefeated in the pre-season? Yeah he gets a 1 by default..I like what i see so far but Spurrier killed it for ya

How did Spurrier kill anything for me? I'm not sure I understand what you're saying

How did Spurrier kill anything for me? I'm not sure I understand what you're saying

How have you missed the several other posts pointing to this subject?

I'll catch you up. Spurrier was had AMAZING results in the preseason which included scoring the most points EVER in preseason history! Then came out like a lame duck.
Not saying Zorn is identical to Spurrier, don't think anyone is saying that, but we are cautious that we have seen positive results in the preseason go sour when it matters most.

It's impossible to judge someone when nothing important or significant has occured.

Is it pronounced ZORN-o-meter, or is it zorn-OMETER?

Obviously this is the most critical question.

Is it pronounced ZORN-o-meter, or is it zorn-OMETER?

Obviously this is the most critical question.

That sounds awfully familiar

http://www.thewarpath.net/462135-post37.html

Ah, yes I remember those spurrier days. we were pretty awesome in preseason. too bad we had patrick ramsey (or j. patrick as spurrier called him????) amongst most other starters playing twice as long if not longer than any other starter in the league during preseason. Not to mention exposing the playbook before game 1. We should look at the positives from our first 2 preseason games this year. #1 Our first string offense has scored touchdowns against a first string defense in both games. #2 Our first string defense has held other first string offenses to 6 points, with 3 coming by default.(w/o Landry i might add) #3 Our second string for the most part looks good enough where someone can comfortably step in due to injury. (they did last year) #4 and last but not least...no major injuries, at least thus far. hopefully we can keep it up when week 1 arrives.

I am at a 4. I really like what he's doing and where the team is at. Of course when the real bullets start flying things could change.

Did anyone hear Portis' interview on the Sports Reporters show (ESPN 980 in DC) last evening? I almost drove my car off the beltway when he said that Gibbs did not have any (thats 0) audibles last year. Whatever play was called in the huddle was what they went with because there were no checkdowns or audibles. That is an amazing statement. And to think we laughed at Marty when he used only 1.

I am at a 4. I really like what he's doing and where the team is at. Of course when the real bullets start flying things could change.

Did anyone hear Portis' interview on the Sports Reporters show (ESPN 980 in DC) last evening? I almost drove my car off the beltway when he said that Gibbs did not have any (thats 0) audibles last year. Whatever play was called in the huddle was what they went with because there were no checkdowns or audibles. That is an amazing statement. And to think we laughed at Marty when he used only 1.

I thought that was interesting because wasn't there a whole fuss last year when (maybe after the first Giants' game?) Gibbs made a comment about how he had given Campbell the option to run or pass on a critical 3rd down and JC saw the defense and called run?

It's Saunders' offense that doesn't use audibles. I think we covered that a few times previously.