MTK
07-21-2008, 11:01 AM
There's a big difference between starting in pinch which Evans is certainly capable of and becoming a full-time starter. I like Evans, but if he had to start 16 games I'd be concerned.
Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
[18]
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
MTK 07-21-2008, 11:01 AM There's a big difference between starting in pinch which Evans is certainly capable of and becoming a full-time starter. I like Evans, but if he had to start 16 games I'd be concerned. memphisskin 07-21-2008, 11:02 AM Yes, yes he is. Pretty much has been his whole career. Not lazy, or unwilling to improve. Just brutally ineffective. Somehow he was effective enough to be NFL Defensive Player of the Year in 2006. Somehow he is effective enough to be consistently ranked among the best at his position. I see your point about the run defense maybe dropping off a notch. But the pass defense just got raised three or four notches, I'll take that trade off. SKINSnCANES 07-21-2008, 11:02 AM Jason Taylor will make everyone around him better. We had no one worth double teaming on our line. Carter stepped up at the end of the year and may have started to get double teamed. If anything now jason taylor will continue to be double teamed and open up opportunities for the other 3 linemen to get to the QB. Ive always thought Andre Carter was in the mold of Jason Taylor, but hadnt learned all the technique yet. Well now he will learn first hand. No one heard of Adowale Ogunleye (sp) and Taylor turned him into a sack machine by takign the double teams to his side. Im sooo happy we finally have a pass rush with our front four. We need that pressure even more so being thin at corner. GTripp0012 07-21-2008, 11:03 AM Wow, do you try to be negative all the time or does it just come naturally? How are we 'forfeiting the entire season' by getting a better, younger player than the one he replaced? Has ANYONE said that Evans would be a suitable replacement? How can anyone project that a 2nd and 6th round picks will cost us 2-3 wins over a 3 year span? How many games did Taylor Jacobs win us? He was a 2nd round pick. How about Nehemiah Broughton? He was a 6th round pick. The gaps in logic are mind blowing!!Sorry, but you're wrong here. I also think you need to be more careful when you read (or maybe I need to be more careful when I write). The team could have just plugged in Evans, but they felt that was a worst case scenario (so they went out and got Taylor). I'm only questioning their logic that Evans would have been a worst case scenario. It's going to cost us games in the future because we're old. The idea is that if we use the 2nd round pick wisely, we could improve the team in the long run, which we can't do now. 2-3 wins in a 3 year span isn't a big deal, I don't think, but it's still sort of mortgaging the future. Also, good work assuming that every 2nd and 6th round pick will net talent the equivalent of Taylor Jacobs and Nemo. That's pretty pessimistic of you. skinsnut 07-21-2008, 11:03 AM Evans aint the answer folks...he's a backup...to start, he'd need further grooming... Ideal scenario is Evans plays situationally for a couple years and develops into a starter before JT retires....however.....Evans aint ready to start for the whole season yet....1 or 2 games maybe...but that is why he's a backup. I am glad JT was available...I was just hoping we'd pay a lower price GTripp0012 07-21-2008, 11:06 AM Somehow he was effective enough to be NFL Defensive Player of the Year in 2006. Somehow he is effective enough to be consistently ranked among the best at his position. I see your point about the run defense maybe dropping off a notch. But the pass defense just got raised three or four notches, I'll take that trade off.I think it makes our defense significantly better this year. Daniels wasn't very good at all against the run last year, and though Taylor isn't an improvement in that respect, he will bring plenty of additional pass rush that we wouldn't have had otherwise. If we make the playoffs this year, I think the move will justify itself. If we don't make the playoffs, then it probably wasn't a good idea. There's no doubt we're a better team now than we were yesterday, but better doesn't mean we become favorites in the division or anything. MTK 07-21-2008, 11:08 AM I'm really not sure how losing a 2nd and a 6th equates to losing 2-3 games down the road, that's purely speculative. DGreene28 07-21-2008, 11:10 AM Sorry but dancing does not get you in football shape. If his head and heart were 100% into football he wouldn't be going on dancing shows. I know I'm in the minority but to me that's just awful. Some of the best players have used non traditional methods of getting themselves into shape. Dancing, yoga-doing football players. - By Neal Pollack - Slate Magazine (http://www.slate.com/id/2124158/) It could be said the added flexibility Taylor gained from doing the Pasa Doble this offseason will help him get closer to the ground as he breaks around the LT. This is a great trade, kudos to the FO for getting it done so expeditiously. Paintrain 07-21-2008, 11:10 AM Sorry, but you're wrong here. I also think you need to be more careful when you read (or maybe I need to be more careful when I write). The team could have just plugged in Evans, but they felt that was a worst case scenario (so they went out and got Taylor). I'm only questioning their logic that Evans would have been a worst case scenario. It's going to cost us games in the future because we're old. The idea is that if we use the 2nd round pick wisely, we could improve the team in the long run, which we can't do now. 2-3 wins in a 3 year span isn't a big deal, I don't think, but it's still sort of mortgaging the future. Also, good work assuming that every 2nd and 6th round pick will net talent the equivalent of Taylor Jacobs and Nemo. That's pretty pessimistic of you. It read as if we were forfeiting the season by trading for Taylor so my mistake if it was misinterpreted. I don't know that they felt that putting Evans in there was a worst case scenario, it was just obvious that Taylor was a better case scenario! Look, it's not like they traded 1st, 2nd and 3rd round picks for a scrub. Right player, right situation, right price. It's a winning deal. I wasn't assuming that every 2nd and 6th pick equates to Jacobs or Nemo, just pointing out that it's not a guarantee that they will pan out, reflecting your 2-3 win argument. Yes building thru the draft is ideal, but in a scenario where you can get one of the top players at his position in the game to fill an immediate need for a reasonable price, you do it, every time. GTripp0012 07-21-2008, 11:11 AM YES!!!!! Do you guys not comprehend the concept of backups? There's no team that has 30 starting caliber players! There are starters and backups. Like there are bosses and secretaries. Not everyone is at the level to be a starter in the NFL. For whatever reason-lack of strength, speed, stamina, whatever-Evans is NOT a starter in the NFL.This is pretty ridiculous. Not the fact that there are starters and backups on every team. That much is obvious. What I find ridiculous is the notion that players can't move between the designations in your mind: once a player is a backup, he's a backup for life, and if he's a starter, he's earned a starting job for life. Demetric's been a pretty good backup, which means on about 27 teams in the NFL, if the starter goes down, he gets first crack to prove he can hold the fort...as a starter. We apparently aren't one of those 27 teams. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum