Day 1 Draft Grade

Solid B for great value, would have liked to have seen at least 1 need filled along the lines but when you look at the value we got I'm finding it hard to have anything really bad to say, especially when we still have 6 selections left.

exactly.
Great answer, I 100% agree.

Late to the party here...I give it a C...we need linemen on both sides of the ball...Devin Thomas was a good pickup but beyond that we grabbed too many receivers...almost like they are just going to throw all of them up against the wall and see which one sticks...and the TE we drafted? WTF?!?!?

Late to the party here...I give it a C...we need linemen on both sides of the ball...Devin Thomas was a good pickup but beyond that we grabbed too many receivers...almost like they are just going to throw all of them up against the wall and see which one sticks...and the TE we drafted? WTF?!?!?

One of those two (if not both) are bound to be good, and both were projected 1st rounders, so I have no problem with the picks.
Like others I wanted a DE, so I am not happy with the Davis pick instead of Campbell, but maybe they have something up their sleeves for the June 1st cuts or something. The offseason is still young.

Ithink we should have taken Calias Campbell & Kelly Or Kelly and LIMAS SWEED

I give us an A- We need these recievers for the west coast offense. By just placing these guys on the field with moss and ARE, they will have a much easier time getting open looks. Same thing goes for Cooley, in that Zorn will be using two TE formations. I don't see why we can't just retune the O and Dlines next year, considering we had the 8th best defense in the league last year. Hail Greg Novis the snake charmer!

F, because we saw a draft that was based off a front-office strategy that is fundamentally flawed.

F, because the Redskins vision is dictated by someone who has no experience in the sport.

F, because we drafted a bunch of Christmas ornaments while neglecting the tree.

F, because teams like the Patriots and Giants show us that it starts in the trenches and we seem to want to ignore what successful franchises do.

F, because we are going to see a team that resembles the Spurrier team (after Marvin Lewis left).

F, because we have the worst management in all of the NFL.

We're going to see a team that resembles the post-Marvin Lewis Spurrier teams? You mean the Joe Gibbs teams??

Nope, I mean 2003 - when we went 5-11 with a lousy defense and no protection for our quarterback.

F, because we saw a draft that was based off a front-office strategy that is fundamentally flawed.

F, because the Redskins vision is dictated by someone who has no experience in the sport.

F, because we drafted a bunch of Christmas ornaments while neglecting the tree.

F, because teams like the Patriots and Giants show us that it starts in the trenches and we seem to want to ignore what successful franchises do.

F, because we are going to see a team that resembles the post-Marvin Lewis Spurrier teams.

F, because we have the worst management in all of the NFL.

wow...someone is a grumpy-puss. Go grab a beer man.

wow...someone is a grumpy-puss. Go grab a beer man.

I did that for six hours last night. Actually, that may be why I am grumpy.

I would be so happy if we had taken Campbell or Groves instead of the TE, and an offensive lineman with the third pick in the second round.

SO HAPPY!

Instead, I'm totally baffled by this draft.

Every year we go out and do something ridiculous to bring in wide receivers when we should be building up our lines. EVERY YEAR!