12thMan
04-27-2008, 12:28 PM
We're up in three more picks...keep your fingers crossed.
Dallas just traded their pick to Detroit.
Dallas just traded their pick to Detroit.
The official 2008 draft discussion threadPages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
[88]
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
12thMan 04-27-2008, 12:28 PM We're up in three more picks...keep your fingers crossed. Dallas just traded their pick to Detroit. MTK 04-27-2008, 12:30 PM Still plenty of quality offensive lineman available Cooley1 04-27-2008, 12:30 PM Here we go 3 picks away. Who are we taking at 96? GTripp0012 04-27-2008, 12:30 PM GTripp, Do you think we took Thomas because of the hype? Thomas is 6'2", has 4.4 speed, is very strong and agile, has good hands, is tough, and puts up excellent stats in 2007. It sounds like he's unpolished and it might not work out, but that's probably why we passed on him @ 21. We used our #2 pick to draft a boom/bust wideout.From the information SmootSmack dug up, it sounds like we would have taken him at 21, had we not got the trade. I do think we took Thomas because of the hype. Most of our draft week focus centered around Malcolm Kelly. I know we had met with Thomas, but we clearly weren't expecting him to be there, and took him because he was the most hyped player there. That's not always a bad strategy. The Raiders would have been wise to snag Glenn Dorsey before he fell to the Chiefs, but they were locked into McFadden. However, the statistical probability on Devin Thomas based on what he did in college (potential fluke year, left early), the chances he's just totally overmatched in the NFL is probably close to 50%. Of course that gives him a 50% chance of being average or better, so it is a glass half empty, half full kind of thing. I just feel that the 34th overall pick should be 80% or better to succeed. I don't see Thomas as a boom or bust. I see him as a mediocre-or-bust type guy. His upside looks something like Eddie Kennison's career. His downside, something like Bobby Wade. For us, a league average receiver who is 6'3" and fast isn't all that bad of a selection, but we certainly could have done better, and that's going to eat at me for awhile. Sorry if I let my frustration with the pick influence my assessment of the player. He is a terrible selection though. Hopefully, he can beat the odds and become a starter for us in Washington. We really need it. skinsfan69 04-27-2008, 12:31 PM Why do you come out if you are Devin Thomas? Why does it make any sense? You've had a pretty nice season, but you haven't proved that it can be repeated. You have a year of eligibility left, why not return to school, get better at your trade, and help your college team win? If nothing else, we can tell that Devin Thomas was more interested in a pay day than becoming the best wide receiver he can be. Perhaps I'm wrong on him, and he will be good enough to start in this league. But either way, I'm tired of adding players who are in it for the money. Obviously to an extent, everyones in it for the money. But that didn't stop most players from waiting a year and improving themselves so that they could become the best they could be. Thomas doesn't seem to be worried about improving himself. Malcolm Kelly came out early, but his touchdown production went from 2, to 10, to 9. He's done it multiple years and is a far superior prospect to Thomas. I'm sorry to hate on your guy's parade with reality, but we took a guy on hype, and that rarely works out. I think you're going a little too overboard saying the guy isn't interested in improving himself and he's just in it for the money. You don't even know the guy so to make those statements is simply foolish. Perhaps he has family issues. Or perhaps he just doesn't want to risk injury. I don't have a problem with him coming out. I have a problem taking a guy that high just off one year of production. Sheriff Gonna Getcha 04-27-2008, 12:33 PM Here we go 3 picks away. Who are we taking at 96? Carl Nicks or Dre Moore. GTripp0012 04-27-2008, 12:36 PM I think you're going a little too overboard saying the guy isn't interested in improving himself and he's just in it for the money. You don't even know the guy so to make those statements is simply foolish. Perhaps he has family issues. Or perhaps he just doesn't want to risk injury. I don't have a problem with him coming out. I have a problem taking a guy that high just off one year of production.Maybe he does have family issues. Perhaps he is worried about injuries. Maybe from a life standpoint, it made total sense to go pro because he needed the money more than he needed to improve his game. Again, is that the kind of guy we should be looking to add? CPAlltheWay012 04-27-2008, 12:36 PM Carl Nicks or Dre Moore. nooooo Josh Barrett *prays* GTripp0012 04-27-2008, 12:36 PM Carl Nicks or Dre Moore.Both would be excellent selections. So would Steve Justice. RMSkins 04-27-2008, 12:38 PM With our 3rd round pick (96) the Redskins select: Chad Rinehart OG Northern Iowa |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum