The official 2008 draft discussion thread


Beemnseven
04-26-2008, 08:50 PM
Ok that makes zero sense.

BleedBurgundy
04-26-2008, 08:51 PM
Are we planning on going two TE's this year? Or is Cooley moving back to H-back? SS, what were those off the field issues you alluded to earlier regarding Campbell? Gotta wonder what the heck is up with this pick.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha
04-26-2008, 08:51 PM
Those who subscribe to the "best player available" philosophy shouldn't complain too much about the Davis pick. I personally think we shouldn't draft anyone at RB or TE, but Davis was projected to go higher.

MonkFan4Life
04-26-2008, 08:51 PM
Sooooooooo are we going to trade this guy or something ?

Big C
04-26-2008, 08:52 PM
are we converting him back to wide reciever or using more of a 2 te set?

EARTHQUAKE2689
04-26-2008, 08:52 PM
that is the one position that i thought we would not draft

SKINSnCANES
04-26-2008, 08:52 PM
Y'all are sleepin!

This guy is money... y'all just don't know it yet.

Fight On Trojan Skins!

its supposed to be SKINSnCANES , not SKINSnCONDOMS, heh

just kidding

Beemnseven
04-26-2008, 08:52 PM
Those who subscribe to the "best player available" philosophy shouldn't complain too much about the Davis pick.

I'm not one of those people. We have much bigger needs.

SmootSmack
04-26-2008, 08:52 PM
Fred Davis can play, that's for sure. But did we need him there? We can still get Campbell or Groves easily at 51 and the draft is deep enough at DB that I'm not too upset about not taking one there. But I don't know about passing those up for a TE

Blache must be like "Thanks for hooking me up guys"

bertoskins2
04-26-2008, 08:53 PM
we will really concentrate on our passing game. fred davis is a beast

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum