|
|
SmootSmack 04-22-2008, 06:08 PM I think he has several more years of solid production. But, we wouldn't merely acquire a 30 year old, we'd also lose out on the opportunity to acquire two 21-23 year olds when we're clearly facing age and depth issues. Granted, we have 8 other picks in 2008 and 5 others in 2009. But, as you noted, drafting a future stud is no easy feat. I'd be surprised if we drafted more than 3 future starters with our current crop of picks (or 2 if we traded our 1st rounder).
I want to emphasize that, although I'd oppose trading 2 high picks for Chad, I don't believe that such a trade would send our franchise down the crapper. I simply think there are very legitimate reasons to be concerned with the rumored offer.
Fair enough. At least you're not being idiotic like other people here acting like we're trading 19 picks and Chris Cooley.
Dirtbag59 04-22-2008, 06:10 PM Fair enough. At least you're not being idiotic like other people here acting like we're trading 19 picks and Chris Cooley.
WE'RE TRADING 19 PICKS AND COOLEY FOR CJ?!!?!?!?!?!
http://blog.sbs-rocks.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/the-end-is-near.jpg
EARTHQUAKE2689 04-22-2008, 06:11 PM WE'RE TRADING 19 PICKS AND COOLEY FOR CJ?!!?!?!?!?!
and my moms garden gnome
theJBexperience 04-22-2008, 06:13 PM Probably a picture of him with a women besides his wife, assuming he's married.
Seriously, is he going to test Chad and see if he'll really sit out an entire year? He's got some cajones to do that, but it would certainly teach players that they don't call the shots. I'd like to see it.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha 04-22-2008, 06:15 PM Seriously, is he going to test Chad and see if he'll really sit out an entire year? He's got some cajones to do that, but it would certainly teach players that they don't call the shots. I'd like to see it.
Marvin needs to regain control of the team. I think his latest shots at Chad are attempt to do just that. Smart move....he seemed to be on the cusp of losing the team, the fanbase, and his job.
SmootSmack 04-22-2008, 06:16 PM WE'RE TRADING 19 PICKS AND COOLEY FOR CJ?!!?!?!?!?!
http://blog.sbs-rocks.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/the-end-is-near.jpg
We're sending Ovechkin to the Blue Jackets as part of the deal as well. Also, we're going to become the official website of Chad Johnson. All screen names will now be preceeded with Ocho. And...don't get too comfortable with your first born either.
Larry Michael is Satan 04-22-2008, 06:21 PM 1) Chad goddam Johnson is NOT in the same league as Jerry Rice, Randy Moss, et al, as some have said. That's insane. He's not even the best reciever on his own team, much less all-time great.
2) He plays with an elite NFL QB, and is trashing his team publically because they are not winning. Newsflash: The Skins are a LONG way from being a contender.
3) Do you think getting screamed at on the sideline by some prima dona bitch is gonna help Jason Campbell's confidence and development?
4) Joe Gibbs has obviously left the building if we are making an offer for CJ.
5) No team can afford to pay pro bowl money to THREE recievers.
6) NOBODY is gonna get the ball if we don't have an O-line.
COLOSSAL MISTAKE!!!!!!!!
EARTHQUAKE2689 04-22-2008, 06:21 PM We're sending Ovechkin to the Blue Jackets as part of the deal as well. Also, we're going to become the official website of Chad Johnson. All screen names will now be preceeded with Ocho. And...don't get too comfortable with your first born either.
good thing that i am the middle child and also that I have no kids
EARTHQUAKE2689 04-22-2008, 06:23 PM 1) Chad goddam Johnson is NOT in the same league as Jerry Rice, Randy Moss, et al, as some have said. That's insane. He's not even the best reciever on his own team, much less all-time great.
2) He plays with an elite NFL QB, and is trashing his team publically because they are not winning. Newsflash: The Skins are a LONG way from being a contender.
3) Do you think getting screamed at on the sideline by some prima dona bitch is gonna help Jason Campbell's confidence and development?
4) Joe Gibbs has obviously left the building if we are making an offer for CJ.
5) No team can afford to pay pro bowl money to THREE recievers.
6) NOBODY is gonna get the ball if we don't have an O-line.
COLOSSAL MISTAKE!!!!!!!!
So TJ is better than CJ, and I didnt know his middle name was "goddam" and yes the Redskins are a long way from being a contender we did go 1-15 last year. Seriously are you making any sense right now?
Sheriff Gonna Getcha 04-22-2008, 06:24 PM Larry Michael is Satan:
I agree we shouldn't make the trade, but I think you're overstating your case. Chad Johnson has put up good numbers with a variety of QBs under center not named Carson Palmer. Chad is no Jerry Rice, but he's certainly among the best and most productive wideouts who are currently playing ball. As for our o-line, barring injury, we're in pretty good shape for 2008.
|