Report: Hackett Agrees to Terms with Panthers

MANNINGHAM MANNINGHAM MANNIGHAM! I think it was meant to be that the skins land a hall of famer.

MANNINGHAM MANNINGHAM MANNIGHAM! I think it was meant to be that the skins land a hall of famer.

I dunno about Manningham he's 6'0, but maybe another Monk.

First of all, TD's is the most important recieving stat, I don't care how many field goals a reciever sets up, a TD is more important. Second of all, TD's isnt his only stat where he is good. Over 7 games played (including the playoff game) he had 38 receptions (that's 5.5 receptions per game which is under 1 reception per game less than Keyshawns 102 catches) he also had 485 yards over 7 games played. That is averaging 70 yards per game. Santana Moss had 67 receptions over 15 games played (including the playoff game). That is 4.5 receptions per game, which is a larger difference from Hackett than Hackett was from Johnson. Moss had 876 yards over 15 games played which is 58 yards per game. That is 12 yards less than Hackett.


Seeing that Seattle was a pass first team this season and with all the injuries to their recieving core I am not suprised he got those yards at all.

I also don't see the team taking a WR in the first when we just extended both Moss and ARE this offseason. Not in the first, but potentially later in the draft, I could see them going there.

Lol, extensions only mean so much these days. I remember Mike Schula got an extension the week before he was fired. There were also two other guys that got fired soon after they're contract was extended. However with that said I don't see us unloading those guys anytime soon.

Seeing that Seattle was a pass first team this season and with all the injuries to their recieving core I am not suprised he got those yards at all.

That's a very good point. Seattle was a pass first offense, with a veteran quarterback that spread the ball around. So stats were there to be had. That doesn't necessarily mean that D.J. Hackett was all that good. If Jason Campbell can adjust to the new offense, I see Santana Moss and Antwaan Randle-EL's numbers increasing. Resigning Reche Caldwell might be the best option. He is a very capable receiver and would be a good third option. I'm also hoping Mix steps up and becomes a viable option.

Originally Posted by BeastsoftheNFCeast
First of all, TD's is the most important recieving stat, I don't care how many field goals a reciever sets up, a TD is more important. Second of all, TD's isnt his only stat where he is good. Over 7 games played (including the playoff game) he had 38 receptions (that's 5.5 receptions per game which is under 1 reception per game less than Keyshawns 102 catches) he also had 485 yards over 7 games played. That is averaging 70 yards per game. Santana Moss had 67 receptions over 15 games played (including the playoff game). That is 4.5 receptions per game, which is a larger difference from Hackett than Hackett was from Johnson. Moss had 876 yards over 15 games played which is 58 yards per game. That is 12 yards less than Hackett.



Moss played 15 games so of course his numbers are gonna be lower than hacketts.. His average is gonna change everytime he touches the ball. thats like saying Cartwright is a better RB than portis because he had a 7.0 ypc average as a RB.

But he only ran the ball once, for 7.0 yards, sio of cours his average is gonna be larger than portis's.

I dont agree with your arguement at all

Moss played 15 games so of course his numbers are gonna be lower than hacketts.. His average is gonna change everytime he touches the ball. thats like saying Cartwright is a better RB than portis because he had a 7.0 ypc average as a RB.

But he only ran the ball once, for 7.0 yards, sio of cours his average is gonna be larger than portis's.

I dont agree with your arguement at all

Thank you! It's like saying Mattyk started 81 games and hit 35 homeruns, but DirtySkin had 1 homerun in 1 game played so clearly he would have hit 81 in 81 games.

Moss played 15 games so of course his numbers are gonna be lower than hacketts.. His average is gonna change everytime he touches the ball. thats like saying Cartwright is a better RB than portis because he had a 7.0 ypc average as a RB.

But he only ran the ball once, for 7.0 yards, sio of cours his average is gonna be larger than portis's.

I dont agree with your arguement at all

Absolutely agree with you! Good arguement.

ps- Moss played in 14 games (just an FYI)

Lol, extensions only mean so much these days. I remember Mike Schula got an extension the week before he was fired. There were also two other guys that got fired soon after they're contract was extended. However with that said I don't see us unloading those guys anytime soon.Among one of the things it does mean is known as "guarenteed money" or "guarenteed salary cap space" or basically, the inability to get away from those players as your starters.

Basically, it means we aren't drafting a receiver in the first round.

That's a very good point. Seattle was a pass first offense, with a veteran quarterback that spread the ball around. So stats were there to be had. That doesn't necessarily mean that D.J. Hackett was all that good. If Jason Campbell can adjust to the new offense, I see Santana Moss and Antwaan Randle-EL's numbers increasing. Resigning Reche Caldwell might be the best option. He is a very capable receiver and would be a good third option. I'm also hoping Mix steps up and becomes a viable option.It definately doesn't automatically mean that Hackett got those yards because he was good (certainly it could have been because of circumstance), but in Hackett's case, he had performed well not only last year, but also in '05 and '06. He's a very safe pickup for Carolina.

Plus he won the MNF Fish Catching contest in 2005. Of course he's going to be good ;).