Redskins Deny Bryant Johnson Visit Scheduled

Pages : 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

celts32
03-03-2008, 03:46 PM
Maybe a little off topic but why does JLC always need to make mention how hard he's working? There are a lot harder jobs in this world then covering a football team. I am sure he has bad days at the office just like the rest of us but we really don't need to hear him whining every day online.

MTK
03-03-2008, 03:48 PM
What do you mean he does something everytime he gets a shot? He started 8 games last year and had 26 catches for 291 yards and 2 TDs. So what exactly does he do?

(As a comparison David Patten started 7 games in 2006 and had 22 catches for 217 yards and 0 TDs.)

LOL I'm scratching my head over that one too.

He's never even had a 100 yard game if you can believe it.

celts32
03-03-2008, 03:52 PM
LOL I'm scratching my head over that one too.

He's never even had a 100 yard game if you can believe it.

He never had a 100 yard game? That has me 2nd guessing if we should even be bringing him in.

SmootSmack
03-03-2008, 03:59 PM
Maybe a little off topic but why does JLC always need to make mention how hard he's working? There are a lot harder jobs in this world then covering a football team. I am sure he has bad days at the office just like the rest of us but we really don't need to hear him whining every day online.

You should start writing your posts that way :)

"Well I just put little Celt Jr. to sleep, took a while because he's hopped up on fruit punch Capri Sun. Might want to keep an eye on Bryant Johnson. Ok, that's all I got. I'm beat! Need a break. I'm gonna take a nap now."

MTK
03-03-2008, 04:00 PM
Check out his stats (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/6353/gamelog;_ylt=ApDXuJFj7wIFJDqdhWNK4kD.uLYF), very underwhelming. I just quickly scanned through all of his game logs and I didn't see a 100 yard game in there.

Here are his best games by season:

2007: 6-80
2006: 6-82
2005: 6-66-1
2004: 7-54
2003: 6-86

TheMalcolmConnection
03-03-2008, 04:00 PM
And ____________ - _____________ is on my iPod right now.

celts32
03-03-2008, 04:11 PM
Check out his stats (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/6353/gamelog;_ylt=ApDXuJFj7wIFJDqdhWNK4kD.uLYF), very underwhelming. I just quickly scanned through all of his game logs and I didn't see a 100 yard game in there.

Here are his best games by season:

2007: 6-80
2006: 6-82
2005: 6-66-1
2004: 7-54
2003: 6-86

We need a trade! This crop of free agent WR's is not going to help us.

skinsfan69
03-03-2008, 04:12 PM
My question is why? They've had similar stats and Caldwell has been healthier than Hackett. I'm not saying either should be a number one, must like SS is saying. But I'm thinking let's not waste money on people like Hackett or Johnson in free agency and let's talk about the draft.

Caldwell has been around for several years and I think we've kind of seen what he is going to be. We're his 3rd team?? Good players don't tend of bounce around to 3 teams in 5 years. WR's like Caldwell are a dime a dozen. With Hackett we really don't know yet. I know when he was healthy last year he had some big games. That is why he's kind of on the radar because of his potential. But if we have to give Hacket a new deal and it's going to cost a lot of $ then I say we pass. I'd rather us get a DE and a guard and upgrade the WR's next year.

TheMalcolmConnection
03-03-2008, 04:15 PM
Caldwell has been around for several years and I think we've kind of seen what he is going to be. We're his 3rd team?? Good players don't tend of bounce around to 3 teams in 5 years. WR's like Caldwell are a dime a dozen. With Hackett we really don't know yet. I know when he was healthy last year he had some big games. That is why he's kind of on the radar because of his potential. But if we have to give Hacket a new deal and it's going to cost a lot of $ then I say we pass. I'd rather us get a DE and a guard and upgrade the WR's next year.

This is what I'm saying in general. I think that because of the market this year, we're setting ourselves up to pay a lot for someone mediocre. That's why I think Caldwell might come cheaper than Hackett or Johnson.

MTK
03-03-2008, 04:20 PM
I think Hackett has star potential. When healthy the guy produces, he just needs to get over that hump as far as injuries go. Here are some of his big games over the course of his career:

2007:
Week 9: 6-58-1
Week 10: 8-101-1
Week 11: 9-136-1
Playoffs against the Skins: 6-101-1

2006:
Week 12: 5-67-1
Week 14: 4-104-1
Week 15: 8-87
Week 17: 4-63-1

2005:
Week 10: 2-78-1
Week 11: 6-67-1

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum