Warrior1971
02-27-2008, 12:42 AM
I think we can give him some thought, who knows may be a good option.
Ernest Wilford - FAPages :
1
[2]
Warrior1971 02-27-2008, 12:42 AM I think we can give him some thought, who knows may be a good option. MTK 02-27-2008, 10:21 AM If we want a big WR just stick with developing Mix. ingibbswetrust 02-27-2008, 10:44 AM No hokies do well in the NFL...STAY AWAY. cpayne5 02-27-2008, 10:52 AM No hokies do well in the NFL...STAY AWAY. Bruce Smith did OK. freddyg12 02-27-2008, 11:21 AM Wilford never had great hands, he would drop some passes at VT & I recall him having some problems in J'ville. But it seems he's become pretty dependable w/the limited no. of attempts he gets. I like him cause he's a Hokie & a good team guy, but I'm weary of bringin in another slow reciever. He's not better than Caldwell & he's probably slower. We not only need height we need some speed too. Moss is the only guy that can sprint by a db. Big C 02-27-2008, 04:28 PM Bruce Smith did OK. haha yeah, bruce smith, antonio freeman, darryl tapp is a recent one, shayne graham... Carnage 02-27-2008, 04:48 PM Wilford might be just what we need, but he is NOT fast. He can play though. JGisLordOfTheRings 02-27-2008, 05:20 PM A big reciever here in DC would be great. I really dont see how this could be a bad move. He's a FA and if he's not asking for a dumpload of cash, then sign him, why the F not? It's painstakingly obvious that we need a possesion receiver. Dirtyskin21 02-28-2008, 02:24 AM A big reciever here in DC would be great. I really dont see how this could be a bad move. He's a FA and if he's not asking for a dumpload of cash, then sign him, why the F not? It's painstakingly obvious that we need a possesion receiver. yeah exactly, and it would be out the box. If we still wanted to draft a receiver we could and he could help mix and the guy we draft develop but this guy makes clutch catches, he's a big body, and will go across the middle.. he's not 'slow' by any means but hes not a burner either. Dirtyskin21 02-28-2008, 02:26 AM While I disagree with you on the whole Wilford over Hacket dibocle, at least you bring numbers and facts to the table on top of what you think personally. That way I feel like I'm debating with a person instead of a monkey. A lot of people around here lobby for a player with little or no basis for their opinion, saying stuff like "man this guy is so 1337, we must sign." "Why?" "Cuz he r so awesome." "But the guy only averages 2 yards per carry behind a decent offensive line." "But he wears vizor, we must have. Plus in Madden he has 98 speed." With that said I still prefer Hacket. Though if Hacket commands to high a price I wouldn't mind Wilford. hhaha yeah I understand what you mean.. I just seriously think this guy could be a noce target for campbell to learn to bond with.. He's been trying to battle for a spot amongst a ton of 1st round WR that the jags have picked. He's had limited reps but has done pretty well. I think he could be a great sign. HE's used to about the same kind of west coast offense we will be running, |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum