Sean Salisbury vs John Clayton

sean salisbury is an ass. He definitely uses verbal aggression to get his point across. I think he is a worthless analyst. John Clayton is far better.

Salisbury acts like a high school bully who is being outsmarted by the straight A geek in science class. He makes off like a complete ass but the fact that he does it in Clayton's face is funny as hell.

His follow up "Tales from the crypt" after he calls him cryptkeeper is what had me rolling though. Ah...the locker room days of old.

http://www.themathlab.com/images/cartoons/1gazoobig.jpg

Seriously though, it was probably a bit out of line for Salisbury to say it on camera but the truth is these guys are always playfully ripping each other off camera. At the same time they have a mutual respect. Salisbury's a very blunt, loud guy. On and off camera. He's in your face and likes to heckle. But he's not really a bad person. Clayton is all class all the time, but he's got a sharp sense of humor

THAT WAS AWFUL. SS is a dick and he sucked as a QB. It's fine to jab at each other but that was over the line and I've seen him on many occasions do that to Clayton. Clayton is a geek but he's damn good at his job.

I don't think SS would have went there if he didn't think Clayton could handle it.

First off, Salisbury is an idiot. he will always be. When he couldnot handle Clayton (which is frequently), he went personal.

Note:
Clayton is kind of a........creepster. Always reminds me of the son of the Creepy DEAD preacher on Poltergeist 2

I'd have to agree with Mattyk72. If you ever watch these two go at it on ESPN, they take shots at each other all the time. Some times Salisbury comes across like a d*ck, some times Clayton is the d-bag. Salisbury probably apologized afterwards, but if he didn't, they are big boys. They can take it. Just my opinion, but think of this: how many times did anyone think Stephen A. Smith came across as being harsh when he was first on ESPN? I did, but after listening to what he had to say over time, I've come to respect what he says. He makes valid points, even if it seems like he's "up in your face" with what he says. He's friggin' awesome & his show is great on ESPN Radio.

I'd have to agree with Mattyk72. If you ever watch these two go at it on ESPN, they take shots at each other all the time. Some times Salisbury comes across like a d*ck, some times Clayton is the d-bag. Salisbury probably apologized afterwards, but if he didn't, they are big boys. They can take it. Just my opinion, but think of this: how many times did anyone think Stephen A. Smith came across as being harsh when he was first on ESPN? I did, but after listening to what he had to say over time, I've come to respect what he says. He makes valid points, even if it seems like he's "up in your face" with what he says. He's friggin' awesome & his show is great on ESPN Radio.

Yeah they seem to have a friendly relationship so I don't see this as an issue at all.

I recently started listening to Smith's show and I have to say I really like him too. I like him more on the radio vs. on TV. Plus he just cracks me up how he gets fired up over things.

Stephen A. Smith is hysterical when he goes into his rants. Mattyk72, we some times don't agree about things on here, but on this, I think we are on the same page.

Chris Berman Goes Crazy (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5300530023914982214&q=chris+berman&total=141&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0)


How about The Swami flipping out

I figured Salisbury was like his character from "The Benchwarmers"...

SmootSmack has said it numerous times that these 2 have nothing but the utmost respect for each other, and since all 3 have the same signature on their paychecks, I'll go ahead and tend to believe Double S when he talks about it.