WillH
02-05-2008, 04:23 AM
Fine. We're just going to go in circles about this. I think of the four known choices remaining Fassel is the best fit for this team and I think there are enough examples in recent (last two) years, coupled with Fassel's experience and succcess, that say Fassel can do very well as our head coach.
But I understand that he's the anti-flavor of the month
I think you are being a little unfair. Sure there is plenty to suggest Fassel is a good candidate, but the concerns about hiring a retread coach I think are valid. You may not buy into it, but others aren't convincing themselves of this because Fassel isn't popular. Id argue that Fassel isn't popular because of these concerns. I also think it is legitimate that some are excited at the prospect of a young, vibrant, though unproven, coach. The next HOF coach has to come from somewhere right?
Anyways, I happen to agree that Fassel seems to be the most logical choice because of the strength of his resume and the fact that the coaching staff was seemingly assembled around him. If, however, DS and VC hadn't backed themselves into that corner I'd be more inclined to give a younger prospect a shot. Like most others I thought GW was the best choice, but he apparently didn't see eye to eye with DS so he's gone. Now I feel Fassel will be the best choice, but I am anything but excited about him. I hope that the plan is to bring along Olivadotti to be the future HC; that sounds like a winning formula. A guy brought up in house can have a clear understanding of the team, and a clear vision of what it will take to be successful in the long run.
Anyways I hope that they eventually explain to us WTF went on throughout this process. They have left alot of questions unanswered thus far, and though Im sure it will lack much substance, I think we deserve some clarification.
But I understand that he's the anti-flavor of the month
I think you are being a little unfair. Sure there is plenty to suggest Fassel is a good candidate, but the concerns about hiring a retread coach I think are valid. You may not buy into it, but others aren't convincing themselves of this because Fassel isn't popular. Id argue that Fassel isn't popular because of these concerns. I also think it is legitimate that some are excited at the prospect of a young, vibrant, though unproven, coach. The next HOF coach has to come from somewhere right?
Anyways, I happen to agree that Fassel seems to be the most logical choice because of the strength of his resume and the fact that the coaching staff was seemingly assembled around him. If, however, DS and VC hadn't backed themselves into that corner I'd be more inclined to give a younger prospect a shot. Like most others I thought GW was the best choice, but he apparently didn't see eye to eye with DS so he's gone. Now I feel Fassel will be the best choice, but I am anything but excited about him. I hope that the plan is to bring along Olivadotti to be the future HC; that sounds like a winning formula. A guy brought up in house can have a clear understanding of the team, and a clear vision of what it will take to be successful in the long run.
Anyways I hope that they eventually explain to us WTF went on throughout this process. They have left alot of questions unanswered thus far, and though Im sure it will lack much substance, I think we deserve some clarification.