Bill B
02-02-2008, 09:58 PM
Below is Pete Prisco's take on Art Monk getting in over Andre Reed. Prisco left off that Reed had zero Supre Bowl Rings while Monk had 3.
"Those two failed to get selected to the Hall on Saturday, as six other men beat them out. Dent was a better player than fellow end Fred Dean, who did get elected. Reed was a better player than Art Monk, a receiver who also was part of the 2008 six-man class.
Monk retired as the leading all-time receiver in 1995 with 940 catches, but Reed retired with 951. Reed had 87 touchdown catches, while Monk had 68. Reed averaged 13.9 per catch to Monk's 13.5 per catch.
So who deserved it more?"
Prisco's Points - CBSSports.com (http://cbs.sportsline.com/columns/weblogs/entry/10612907)
SCRedskinsFan
02-02-2008, 10:32 PM
He also left out that Art Monk is in the Hall of Fame! lol
scowan
02-02-2008, 10:40 PM
If Reed was so good, he should have caught a Superbowl winning TD! Monk has 3 Rings! AND had the single season Recieption record of 108 at one time, before teams passed 80% of the time!
That Guy
02-02-2008, 10:57 PM
boo hoo, hopefully he appreciates crying about it for the next 8 years. jerk.
FRPLG
02-02-2008, 11:07 PM
Didn't Carter say Monk shouldn't be in the HOF?
GMScud
02-02-2008, 11:22 PM
Eat shit Prisco. He's a moron. Obviously.
redskinmania
02-02-2008, 11:24 PM
The real question is who picks these idiots who vote.
Fuck Prisco...that asshole probably believes that Rich Gannon should be in the Hall of Fame, or somebody like Wade Wilson should be in...
Now its not often that a skins fan can do this to someone with the cowboys out there having 5 of these but...3 rings bitch 3 rings!!!!!! How many did Carter,Reed, or the Bills have at all?
and even if my history is a little shakey, but aren't the bills that Reed played for the same team that went to the superbowl not once not twice not even 3 times but 4 times AND LOST ALL 4 DAMN TIMES...yeah Shut up Prisco just shut the FUCK up.
If reed was so great...why in the hell didn't he ever help his team to win the superbowl...he ONLY had 4 chances to do so.
BTW I don't recall Reed being able to crack a defender like monk could Monk was one of those recivers that could pancake the shit out of someone on a run
Don't go away mad...just go away..
squrrelco3
02-03-2008, 12:14 AM
Guys...guys...guys...
who cares what anyone else thinks
Monk's in
justice has been served
ssssssssswwwwwwweeeeeeeeeeet!!!
shallyshal
02-03-2008, 12:15 AM
Below is Pete Prisco's take on Art Monk getting in over Andre Reed. Prisco left off that Reed had zero Supre Bowl Rings while Monk had 3.
"Those two failed to get selected to the Hall on Saturday, as six other men beat them out. Dent was a better player than fellow end Fred Dean, who did get elected. Reed was a better player than Art Monk, a receiver who also was part of the 2008 six-man class.
Monk retired as the leading all-time receiver in 1995 with 940 catches, but Reed retired with 951. Reed had 87 touchdown catches, while Monk had 68. Reed averaged 13.9 per catch to Monk's 13.5 per catch.
So who deserved it more?"
Prisco's Points - CBSSports.com (http://cbs.sportsline.com/columns/weblogs/entry/10612907)
reed is ALSO worthy of the HOF
i hope he gets in next year. there is no reason why an injustice should be done to reed just because one was done to monk for 7 years