scafuri27
02-01-2008, 07:16 AM
The Redskins pick 21st, one selection after the Buccaneers who are in the 20th spot. The teams both went 9-7 but from what I understand tie breaker is strenghth of schedule Bucs .469 Skins .555. The league should adjust this format. The Bucs beat us in the regular season, won their division, and were a higher seeded playoff team and they get to select above us in the first round of the draft. The frist 2 tiebreakers should be head to head and playoff seeding.
onlydarksets
02-01-2008, 08:28 AM
I agree - that doesn't really make a whole lot of sense.
GTripp0012
02-01-2008, 09:08 AM
Seems as if it would make more sense to just use the league's normal tiebreaker rules; head to head, conference record, division record*, common opponents record, strength of schedule,
skinsnut
02-01-2008, 09:21 AM
didn't this used to be a coin flip situation?
or is that the supplemental draft?
I'm not really knowledgeable on this draft order stuff....but dont teams that tie switch positions in subsequent rounds?
IE...do the skins have a better 2nd rounder than the bucs?
SouperMeister
02-01-2008, 09:44 AM
The Redskins pick 21st, one selection after the Buccaneers who are in the 20th spot. The teams both went 9-7 but from what I understand tie breaker is strenghth of schedule Bucs .469 Skins .555. The league should adjust this format. The Bucs beat us in the regular season, won their division, and were a higher seeded playoff team and they get to select above us in the first round of the draft. The frist 2 tiebreakers should be head to head and playoff seeding.I couldn't agree with you more on this.
Joe Ribbs BBQ
02-01-2008, 11:13 AM
with our situation as a perfect example showing why this should be changed by the league
celts32
02-01-2008, 11:37 AM
It's great to take the teams that benefited all year from an easier schedule and then reward them at draft time also. Makes no sense what so ever...I will take the 32 draft pick if i can move into the NFC South and play those teams twice a year.
dmek25
02-01-2008, 01:47 PM
It's great to take the teams that benefited all year from an easier schedule and then reward them at draft time also. Makes no sense what so ever...I will take the 32 draft pick if i can move into the NFC South and play those teams twice a year.
actually, this does make sense. they had an easier schedule, and could still only muster 9 wins. the league is thinking they should have won more with that schedule
GTripp0012
02-01-2008, 01:51 PM
actually, this does make sense. they had an easier schedule, and could still only muster 9 wins. the league is thinking they should have won more with that scheduleThough strength of schedule is on the better side in terms of accurate statistics, it's hard to make the realistic argument that we were better than Tampa this year. They won their division, killed everyone in their division, and beat us. While the quality of opponents they played was very clearly weaker than ours, they dominated in most of their wins which is something that we wouldn't have been able to do playing their schedule (though we likely would have done better than 9-7).
But subscribing to the assumption that Tampa was better than us, a perfect system would have use picking ahead of them in the draft.
Whatever though, 20th/21st doesn't really make a damn difference.
sancho2613
02-01-2008, 04:01 PM
actually, this does make sense. they had an easier schedule, and could still only muster 9 wins. the league is thinking they should have won more with that schedule
It didn't make sense to me at first but I think you're right. If both teams have the same amount of wins then on paper the Skins would be the "better" team since they had a harder schedule...