|
SmootSmack 01-29-2008, 06:14 PM So with the upcoming West Coast Offense, there's been a lot of talk about how will Campbell will adjust to playing in that system.
But I don't think that's the biggest issue really. I think where we need to be concerned is at the WR position. Our top two guys-Moss and El-seem ill prepared to be elite receivers in the WCO. Granted, they're tough and quick and have shown they can go over the middle? But on a regular basis?
I love Moss and would hate to see him go, but will he be wasted here in DC now? Will Anthony Mix suddenly become indespensible? Does Malcolm Kelly become a draft priority? Will Robin escape the clutches of The Penguin? Can Batman Save Gotham? Tune in tomorrow....
Seriously though, vote
GTripp0012 01-29-2008, 06:17 PM This goes back to what I was saying in another thread, and that's the assumption that smaller receivers are any less effective in the WCO than another system. To me, that doesn't make a lick of sense. Smaller receivers have every bit as good of a chance to succeed in the WCO as bigger receivers.
The bigger issue at stake with Moss is whether or not he can hold his own as a starting NFL receiver anymore. I could care less whether or not we think he's too small for a philosophy change.
I don't think I can vote for any of these answers since our runners will actually adapte better to a system that relies on them less than they did to the prior one.
Put on the spot though, I have to wonder how Portis and Betts will do as receivers. Not that they can't, just that they didn't do any of it in the last two years.
Redskins247 01-29-2008, 06:22 PM Will Robin escape the clutches of The Penguin? Can Batman Save Gotham? Tune in tomorrow....
Seriously though, vote
F'ING HILARIOUS!!!
I say Campbell...quick reads is the name of the game in that offense, and I think that's one of his biggest weaknesses right now....with that said, I think he will pick it up and possibly thrive in a west coast sorta offense. The person with the least problem with it....Cooley....aka Mr. Solid.
This goes back to what I was saying in another thread, and that's the assumption that smaller receivers are any less effective in the WCO than another system. To me, that doesn't make a lick of sense. Smaller receivers have every bit as good of a chance to succeed in the WCO as bigger receivers.
The bigger issue at stake with Moss is whether or not he can hold his own as a starting NFL receiver anymore. I could care less whether or not we think he's too small for a philosophy change.
I don't think I can vote for any of these answers since our runners will actually adapte better to a system that relies on them less than they did to the prior one.
Put on the spot though, I have to wonder how Portis and Betts will do as receivers. Not that they can't, just that they didn't do any of it in the last two years.
Portis had 47 catches this year and Betts had 53 in 2006.
EternalEnigma21 01-29-2008, 07:04 PM my biggest concern, is campbell, but we'll see. I am also concerned with the wideout positions, though. I don't really think we're set there, no matter what system we're running. Moss was very inconsistent last year and I think he's shown he's a stellar #2, as well as ARE. Lloyd sucks. Caldwell was pretty clutch and can handle the offense, as shown in NE, but who knows if we'll re-sign him.
QBall 01-29-2008, 07:13 PM Don't think we're going to see a big difference in the Offense. Most NFL offenses are heavily dictated by personel.
Not going to be a "West Coast" offense like san Fran in the days. This is going to be a verticle attacking pass happy version. More run and shoot type of style.
wolfeskins 01-29-2008, 07:28 PM so, are we gonna be looking at a more pass oriented offense ? that would be good,there is definately more passing in todays game then in gibbs first go around. i don't think gibbs really ever adapted to that change in his 2nd stint. i hope, whoever is the new coach, has a more liberal attitude towards passing the ball.
if thats the case, then i'd say the o-line may have the hardest time adjusting.
QBall 01-29-2008, 07:32 PM so, are we gonna be looking at a more pass oriented offense ? that would be good,there is definately more passing in todays game then in gibbs first go around. i don't think gibbs really ever adapted to that change in his 2nd stint. i hope, whoever is the new coach, has a more liberal attitude towards passing the ball.
if thats the case, then i'd say the o-line may have the hardest time adjusting.
Yeah I agree with that.
Think we're in store for some big plays in the air and we may need to look at another top wide out instead of CB or DE with our 1st round pick......
wolfeskins 01-29-2008, 07:37 PM Yeah I agree with that.
Think we're in store for some big plays in the air and we may need to look at another top wide out instead of CB or DE with our 1st round pick......
maybe a wr but they definately still need some defensive help.
you know, with gibbs, saunders and williams gone, i wonder whats going to happen with Lloyd. the new staff could possibly keep him.
squrrelco3 01-29-2008, 08:02 PM I think Campbell will do fine in the WCO he's actually ran it before I think it was offense #3?...lol I'm more concerned about the wideouts...they are a little undersized and had alot of probems dropping balls last year...the WCO needs big receivers that can hang onto the ball and are hard to bring down after the catch.
|