Theory: Putting together a staff for the future

Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

MTK
01-26-2008, 01:16 PM
Alright I'm going to toss my hat in the ring and toss out this theory as to what the plan is.

With Gibbs out of the picture, the nice and easy solution would have been to retain Williams as HC and leave the rest of the staff relatively intact.

Here's the hitch though, this staff was Joe Gibbs' staff. He put it together and let's face it, it wasn't exactly a staff built for the long term. I'm not sure of the average age of the staff, but it's got to be right at the top for one of the oldest, errr, I mean experienced staffs in the league. Again, not a staff built for the long term and not one that was picked by Williams.

So what I'm saying is, even if Williams took over, there was going to be some pretty significant changes. Saunders was probably outta here no matter what, and guys like Breaux and Burns weren't going to stick around with Gibbs out of the picture. You promote GW, you need a new DC, so that's another open spot on the staff. A few other coach's have contracts that are up, so who knows if they would have been retained as well.

There have always been rumblings that Williams and Snyder weren't exactly best buddies the past few years, and Gibbs was the buffer between the two. Just look at Williams' style. Tough guy, disciplinarian, on the arrogant side, sound familiar? Sounds a little like another coach that Snyder didn't play nice with... Marty Schottenheimer. In summary, Williams and Snyder probably weren't going to last in the long run. Eventually their egos would have clashed (probably sooner rather than later), and then where would that have left things? In search of another new HC and more turmoil? If you ask me, if Snyder has any doubt about working with Williams for the long run, the right move is to not even try to go there. Cut the head off this thing now and move on rather than trying to avoid the inevitable. He tried this once with Marty and we all know how that worked out. He doesn't want to go down that road again.

So ultimately I think the plan is to put together a staff for the long run. If that means taking a step backwards now in order to take steps ahead in the future, this is what has to be done. It certainly isn't pretty, but it seems like this is what needs to happen in order for Snyder to have a staff in place that he is comfortable with going forward with.

I have to say that I already like the Zorn hiring, and before you jump all over this notion that why did they hire an OC without having a HC first, let's just point out that Dallas did the same exact thing last year when they hired Garrett before Phillips. Zorn was reportedly high on the lists of all the potential HC's, so it was a no-brainer. I think we're going to see some more quality hirings too and in the end once the dust settles we just might like the looks of the new staff. Give it some more time, stay patient, and let's judge the entire package once everything is in place. Did anyone see the Zorn hiring coming a few weeks ago? I sure didn't. That tells me that someone is doing their homework in this search to turn up quality assistants and they're not just shooting for the big names. Look at some of the other names that have been floated out there. Schwartz, Meeks, Spagnola... not exactly the sexy big names that we always blame Snyder for going after.

Feel free to agree or disagree, but let's just keep things civil. There seems to be this notion that the moderators here don't want to hear any dissenting opinions. That's simply not true, what we're looking for is less emotional over the top stuff and more civil rational discussion.

Fire away. :)

GTripp0012
01-26-2008, 01:19 PM
Hog Heaven | MVN - Most Valuable Network » Blog Archive » The Great Counter Argument (http://mvn.com/nfl-redskins/2008/01/26/the-great-counter-argument/)

I wrote that last night, but a lot of the points you are making are very similar to mine.

MTK
01-26-2008, 01:20 PM
Hog Heaven | MVN - Most Valuable Network » Blog Archive » The Great Counter Argument (http://mvn.com/nfl-redskins/2008/01/26/the-great-counter-argument/)

LOL I swear I didn't see that before writing my take. Nice to see we're on the same page.

AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace
01-26-2008, 01:27 PM
Well, Williams himself wasn't exactly ancient...but I see what you're saying. I guess my problems lie more in the process than in the actual hiring. Time will tell how the players react and how the fans accept the adjustments.

GTripp0012
01-26-2008, 01:29 PM
The process itself, initially, was very thorough. It sure seems like some mistakes have been made of recent though, especially with the alleged contract offering/pulling due to Rex Ryan's disinterest.

Anyway, I think Matty's post best illustrates the way that most people would have wanted us to go with the coaching search three months ago. Since then, a lot of people have become attached to the idea of Gregg Williams at HC. I hope that if Williams officially pulls his name today, people will take it as a sign that this decision was mutual.

Dirtbag59
01-26-2008, 01:40 PM
I think that right now the smartest thing for the Redskins would be to hire Fassal as Head Coach and promote Blache to DC. I think that not only would that help the Redskins maintain continuity but Blache would appreciate the chance to be in a position where other teams would take him seriously as a Head Coaching canidate.

SFREDSKIN
01-26-2008, 01:45 PM
The only way spagnuolo comes here is as a HC, no way the Giants let him go on a parallel move and if the Redskins give him an Associate HC title I can Guarantee you the Giants will match. So this can be tough.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha
01-26-2008, 01:45 PM
Good post Matty and that may very well be Danny's thinking. However, I could see turning things over in the long term best interests of our team if we had a bad season. We won 4 of our last games and made the playoffs. What happened to the continuity? Or was the continuity Snyder and Cerrato?

skinsguy
01-26-2008, 01:50 PM
Like I've said in the Zorn thread, I love the move to get Jim Zorn. I wasn't very impressed with Al Saunders as an OC. I realize Saunders did great things in KC, but that just didn't translate in Washington. I never really felt we needed an offensive coordinator in the first place, but that's a whole different argument. In regards to signing your coordinators on before the head coach, I don't really see a problem with that. I think if anything, it just makes the eventual head coach's job that much easier. He won't have to worry about going out and finding guys to fill those coaching positions, they will already be in place. All he'll be concerned with is implementing the offseason game plan to get ready for next season.

Let us not forget that Gibbs is assisting in some sort of way. I would not be surprised at all if Gibbs is not telling Dan and Vinny who to pick up as coordinators.

TheMalcolmConnection
01-26-2008, 01:52 PM
I AM ready for Schwartz as a possible DC. System would be relatively the same and I really do like the Zorn signing.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum