SBXVII
01-26-2008, 11:42 AM
(Rock Your Face) Nice post. I grew up in the 80's watching Gibbs1 and always wondering why the games had to be so close. Yes there were occassional blow outs. If I'm not mistaken your looking at one of our SB years. Look at all the other years and see how close they were. Gibbs1 was a gentleman. The unwritten rule of the coaching rule was not to embarrass the other coach. When Gibbs got ahead he simply would run the ball to run out the clock. Only in the SB did he seem to blow out the other teams. Heck he was known for his half time adjustments. That tells you right there how piss pour we would play the first half of most games and pull out a win.
Also keep in mind during Gibbs1 there was no such thing as a CAP. I know he managed it well this time around but there is more to it I belive. If Gibbs1 wanted a player bad enough Mr. Cook would out spend everyone for the player. We always seemed to have the biggest OL (slow however) for blocking. You can't simply purchase all the players you need or want. The best teams are building through the draft. Saving money. I would love to see us go this route but it will take years with the CAP hits we will take.
I also enjoyed the post about FAMILY. Your right they were a family back in Gibbs1. Teams could spend all the money they wanted to keep the players on the team. Also back then there seemed to be more of what was called team spirit. When the player came out of college he would usually stick with one team. The rivalries were strong. Since then (maybe the cap is partially to blame) players have jumped ship sometimes to the rival teams which to me seems to have weakened the family feeling. Do we really need the cap anymore? some say yes some say no. It was put in place to help out the less lucrative teams ie; New Orleans, LA Rams(back then), New England(back then) and several other teams. Usually it was because the owner was not putting the money back into the team but his pocket. Some teams did have attendence problems. I say if there is a large market but little support then allow the owner to move his team. Screw the city/fans. Football is all about marketing. Owners need the money to pay the high priced players. Back then there was large differences between a lot of teams now the league is much closer. Owners have figured out how to squeeze the money out of the fans through all the team merchandise and through the media having them pay a lot to show the game. Not to mention food. lol.
Gibbs is the best HC in my opinion and no one else will compare. I have enjoyed what he brought us both times. I dispise the WC offense but this goes back to the cold war and Gibbs offense vs the WC. lol. I think it was all Reagans fault for bringing down the wall. lol just kidding. I guess if it means to have a team blow out other teams like the patriots do and the Colts have been doing then I'll overlook the WC. I just hope DS has not tarnished the Skins like Al Davis has with the Raiders.
Also keep in mind during Gibbs1 there was no such thing as a CAP. I know he managed it well this time around but there is more to it I belive. If Gibbs1 wanted a player bad enough Mr. Cook would out spend everyone for the player. We always seemed to have the biggest OL (slow however) for blocking. You can't simply purchase all the players you need or want. The best teams are building through the draft. Saving money. I would love to see us go this route but it will take years with the CAP hits we will take.
I also enjoyed the post about FAMILY. Your right they were a family back in Gibbs1. Teams could spend all the money they wanted to keep the players on the team. Also back then there seemed to be more of what was called team spirit. When the player came out of college he would usually stick with one team. The rivalries were strong. Since then (maybe the cap is partially to blame) players have jumped ship sometimes to the rival teams which to me seems to have weakened the family feeling. Do we really need the cap anymore? some say yes some say no. It was put in place to help out the less lucrative teams ie; New Orleans, LA Rams(back then), New England(back then) and several other teams. Usually it was because the owner was not putting the money back into the team but his pocket. Some teams did have attendence problems. I say if there is a large market but little support then allow the owner to move his team. Screw the city/fans. Football is all about marketing. Owners need the money to pay the high priced players. Back then there was large differences between a lot of teams now the league is much closer. Owners have figured out how to squeeze the money out of the fans through all the team merchandise and through the media having them pay a lot to show the game. Not to mention food. lol.
Gibbs is the best HC in my opinion and no one else will compare. I have enjoyed what he brought us both times. I dispise the WC offense but this goes back to the cold war and Gibbs offense vs the WC. lol. I think it was all Reagans fault for bringing down the wall. lol just kidding. I guess if it means to have a team blow out other teams like the patriots do and the Colts have been doing then I'll overlook the WC. I just hope DS has not tarnished the Skins like Al Davis has with the Raiders.