DiehardSkin88
02-21-2008, 11:32 AM
Hahaha.... He's more than smacked, your cookin crack buddy. You need to chill out with that stuff, its nooo good.
Do we have anyone we can off-load for Picks.DiehardSkin88 02-21-2008, 11:32 AM Hahaha.... He's more than smacked, your cookin crack buddy. You need to chill out with that stuff, its nooo good. DiehardSkin88 02-21-2008, 11:34 AM And did you forget about Ronnie Brown... They already got their running back. And those two positions are the most easy pos's to fill in the draft... SkinsFanSince91 02-21-2008, 12:37 PM everyone's trade value is lower than their usefulness to us, so the answer is no, not really. betts was worth a LOT more last offseason after that great second half, but now his value's back down again. The only real value we could get is for campbell, but that'd be pretty bloody stupid. meanwhile: patrick ramsey for A.O. (chi DE)... OOPS! mcintosh for lance briggs (chi LB)... oops. so, i'd say our ownership overvalues its unproven players a bit too much. That is exactly why i was lobbying to trade Betts last season while his value was high. and before everyone found out that he can not be a full time back and he as fumble problems. Now we cant trade for shizzy! wilsowilso 02-21-2008, 12:48 PM mk... trade betts, griffin, and mcintosh. betts and mcintosh for the #1 to miami. Ricky Williams wont produce. #1-#21 use 21 for that FS from Miami, I forget his name right now cause im smacked, but he's what that pick should be used for. use #1 for a CB, or even a WR. Trade Griffin for an extra 2nd round.... late probably. draft o line from then on out. we still got Khary, Washington, and Fletcher. HB is going to be solid, and if Godfrey stays, we have all the depth we need at LB. We could get that #1 from Parcells for Betts and McIntosh. Everyone says Ladell isn't as productive, but Parcells is a smart guy. He would use Ladell as his work horse, and make the HC develop the offense around his running style. I know that would work, excusing all the cap stuff blazayblah... Also, if we get a stud CB, we can hang/maim/shoot/trade/lynch Carlos Rogers. He is fast, and I'm sure someone in the league sees potential. Trade him for a pick next year, or some depth at DL. What a 100% worthless post. Well done. SkinsFanSince91 02-21-2008, 01:01 PM Randle El is trade bait. Yea, he is good, but he is grossly overpaid. I think we can do without him, and by trading him that will free up some space for a free agent splash ( Mark my words, we will need one good one this offseason - trust me). If we were to go after Roy Williams, Larry Fitzgerlad, or Moss (if he doesnt want to return), we would need cap room. And not that I am a Gm or anything, but it is illogical in the salary cap era to have so much of yoiur cap allocated to one position (e.g. Detroit). If we kept S. Moss and ARE and then tried to draft a receiver in the 1st or get on via free agency, we would essentially be loking up a hefty percentage of our cap at the WR postion. That will come back to haunt us. I love ARE, but we can trade him, open up cap space, and get a draft pick in the process. Remember that ARE was part of Gibbs doing, and we need to start undoing some of Joe Gibbs organized chaos. The real question is what could we get for ARE that we could live with, and in doing so who would you draft with that pick? XXVI 02-21-2008, 01:53 PM Hahaha.... He's more than smacked, your cookin crack buddy. You need to chill out with that stuff, its nooo good. Yeah, I was on Percocets too... my bad guys... it's still kinda ok of a post, but my bad. No more bong hits and Percocets. LOLOL jsarno 02-21-2008, 02:06 PM Randle El is trade bait. Yea, he is good, but he is grossly overpaid. I think we can do without him, and by trading him that will free up some space for a free agent splash ( Mark my words, we will need one good one this offseason - trust me). 100% agree. Randle El just is not worth it period. If we were to go after Roy Williams, Larry Fitzgerlad, or Moss (if he doesnt want to return), we would need cap room. And not that I am a Gm or anything, but it is illogical in the salary cap era to have so much of yoiur cap allocated to one position (e.g. Detroit). If we kept S. Moss and ARE and then tried to draft a receiver in the 1st or get on via free agency, we would essentially be loking up a hefty percentage of our cap at the WR postion. That will come back to haunt us. In another thread I pointed out the importance of Roy Williams...6'4", only 26, proven big time WR etc...due to the injury bug, we can get him cheaper than Larry Fitzgerald and Randy Moss. I heard in passing that New England either has or will put the franchise tag on R. Moss...not sure how accurate that is, but it's possible / probable. No matter what, we need to get rid of Randle El before bringing in a top notch WR, or we have to hope that Anthony Mix is ready. I love ARE, but we can trade him, open up cap space, and get a draft pick in the process. Remember that ARE was part of Gibbs doing, and we need to start undoing some of Joe Gibbs organized chaos. I'm not as high on Randle El OTHER than he is a great locker room presence, and is of high character. That's what Gibbs did best, and I for one am glad he did it. He even helped to turn around Sean Taylor. So I am not so sure I want to undo what Gibbs did, I'd prefer to complement it. The real question is what could we get for ARE that we could live with, and in doing so who would you draft with that pick? If Detroit is willing to part (or at least entertain the notion) of Reggie Brown and a 4th for Roy Williams, I don't see how Randle El and maybe a 3rd or 4th wouldn't be possible. Good post overall though, I think you're on the money. SkinsFanSince91 02-21-2008, 02:46 PM Thanks. Just want the WR position to stop being a c*ck tease ever siince santana had that monster season two years ago. Longtimefan 02-21-2008, 03:15 PM Brandon Lloyd...Somebody.....Anybody.....Please!! Get back the two picks we gave up for him [one of which was a fourth] and would give us a full compliment for 2008. That Guy 02-22-2008, 06:36 AM i think el's contract kinda keeps him here, so i don't think that's really the most viable way to go when you figure another big contract for the new guy and that'd we'd have to throw in extras anyways. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum