Yet Another Opinion That Skins Need A GM

Pages : 1 2 [3]

redsk1
01-15-2008, 01:45 PM
If the current structure is successful in the draft & builds a young solid team, does the team still need a proper GM? Who knows what the role of the next head coach will be in personel, but it looks like it will be the same 3 headed monster. I have no problems w/how the front office is structured so long as they make sound decisions & field a consistent winner.

Give Danny, Vinny & GW a chance at building through the draft & minimizing free agent signings, then we can see if the team really needs a structural change in the front office.

That's just it, they haven't built a consistent winner. DS/Vinny have been here for how long 8 years? Our record is mediocre at best. Our talent vs other teams is mediocre.

We have made some decent draft choices recently. We've also made some BAD FA signings too (some good too). I just don't trust DS/Vinny to build a team thru the draft. It's not gonna change so i hope they prove me wrong.

bigm29
01-15-2008, 02:06 PM
I have been watching the GM debate churn for some time now. It strikes me that debating whether the Redskins should have a GM is rather like debating whether the Federal Government should have income taxes.

Bottom line is that it is not our call (as loyal fans) to make. We may be vested in our interest and support for the team but that is a far as it goes - we don't get a valid vote on this issue.

we dont get a vaild note on any issue as fans, and there is no issue that is our call. That is the point of this website.

irish
01-15-2008, 02:15 PM
Snyder said that aspect of the organization is not broken and doesnt need fixed. He is not going to hire a GM and now that he has studied under Gibbs I expect Snyder to become like a defacto GM.

SouperMeister
01-15-2008, 03:04 PM
Bobby DePaul would be a great catch if The Danny ever brought on a GM. DePaul is from the area (Bowie, MD), was a Redskins assistant toward the end of Gibbs' first tenure, and has been a personnel guy with the Bears for 6 years now. He's 43 years old, which would be perfect for a GM that could be brought on for the long term.

dogdays
01-21-2008, 07:42 PM
Isn't DePaul with the BEARS?
You want a GM from THERE?

Didn't they pay Archuleta's Redskin bonus to get him after he flopped?
What about their QB disaster situation.
I'm not a fan of the Bears moves...
I'm sick of Casserly too...that dude didn't do so well....westbrook?....shuler?

I like the Reese, GWilliams combo idea best

Who do you think saved the Redskins money, dah,You can,t blame draft picks by the GM on a pwesonel director , you have know clue to what he really does, may be he does the scouting, salary cap,propersonel, contracts, what has vinny done, what have the bears done, really DePaul should probably go to a team dedicated on winning because dan is not a gm he is just an investor and right now,he s definitely making money regardless of winning, so does he really need to make changes , no,he making money thats why he wont change, if it isnt broke dont fix it

REDSKIN-TIME
01-21-2008, 09:15 PM
No Because Dan Thinks He Doing Fine Job

hooskins
01-21-2008, 09:25 PM
There will be no GM. Danny said so already.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum