The case against Cowher

Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7

BrudLee
01-09-2008, 12:28 AM
Here's my take on Cowher.

He is a really good coach. He had some dominant defensive talent early in his career (Greg Lloyd, Kevin Greene, Rod Woodson) and got the most out of them. He stuck with an underperforming QB (Kordell Stewart) for too long, to the eventual detriment of his team. During much of his career, the Steelers were in the worst conference in football (The Bengals were horrible until 2003, the Browns had two winning seasons in his tenure, and the Ravens were schizophrenically great or rotten). There was a stretch in his tenure (1998-2000) where he never finished above 3rd in his division (and people were openly calling for his head), which was righted after realignment (which gave him the Browns, Bengals, and Ravens twice a year).

What part of that screams "We gotta get this guy!"

His demand for total personnel control? Do the names Tommy Maddox or Kordell Stewart give you pause when thinking about ceding complete control?

Is stability the real answer? Because, I think I could prove that the Rooney family doesn't know how to fire people. They haven't fired a head coach since 1968. That guy (Mike Austin) won eleven games in three years, and may have deserved it.

Do we feel like he's the guy who can light a fire in the players' collective belly? Here's the major additions to the Steelers this year: coach Mike Tomlin, and punter Daniel Sepulveda. Who's more responsible for the extra three wins they got this year? My guess is the coach.

The popular notion is that we can throw enough money at Cowher to make him consider this. Perhaps the real question is, do we really want a leader who won't be bothered to get off his couch for less than $10 million?

It should be noted that if Coach Cowher is hired, I'll erase this thread and anyone who dares quote it. I'm a moderator, and I'm crazy in the head.

mooby
01-09-2008, 12:33 AM
I gotta agree, it took the man 15 years to win a Super Bowl with one team. Why are people so enamored with him? Great, he won a Superbowl. Great, he sticks to the run game, and everyone always thinks we are a run first team. But sticking to the run isn't necessessarily a good thing, most Super Bowl winners have a balanced attack nowadays.

SmootSmack
01-09-2008, 12:35 AM
Good thread. Good points.

Let me ask you this, do you think his personnel decisions were hindered by a limited checkbook in Pittsburgh?

BrudLee
01-09-2008, 12:44 AM
Good thread. Good points.

Let me ask you this, do you think his personnel decisions were hindered by a limited checkbook in Pittsburgh?

To some extent - frankly, most teams don't have the advantage the Skins do (with the ability to pay so much in bonuses).

There's a wonderful website ( http://www.steelersalarycap.com/ ) that shows approximately where the team was from 1994 (the first year of the cap) through the present. From 1994 through 2004, they created a statistic called SALVOA, or SALary Value Over Average. The Steelers were below the league average only twice, and never by more than 5%. Does that mean he let valuable players leave the team because he couldn't afford them anymore? And if so, how does that speak to his ability to "buy the groceries"?

Ocliw
01-09-2008, 12:44 AM
Where did the Cowher idea come from anyway?

I've been working a lot.Maybe I missed something.

SmootSmack
01-09-2008, 12:51 AM
To some extent - frankly, most teams don't have the advantage the Skins do (with the ability to pay so much in bonuses).

There's a wonderful website ( http://www.steelersalarycap.com/ ) that shows approximately where the team was from 1994 (the first year of the cap) through the present. From 1994 through 2004, they created a statistic called SALVOA, or SALary Value Over Average. The Steelers were below the league average only twice, and never by more than 5%. Does that mean he let valuable players leave the team because he couldn't afford them anymore? And if so, how does that speak to his ability to "buy the groceries"?

Does SALVOA factor in all players or just the Samoans (see what I did there)?

Anyhow, good information there. For the record, while I could think of worse options Cowher isn't my first choice to take over. My fear, as I told you elsewhere Brud is that if we don't get Cowher this year we'll just try again next year unless we really make a full commitment to someone. Such as Gregg Williams.

BrudLee
01-09-2008, 12:56 AM
Does SALVOA factor in all players or just the Samoans (see what I did there)?

Anyhow, good information there. For the record, while I could think of worse options Cowher isn't my first choice to take over. My fear, as I told you elsewhere Brud is that if we don't get Cowher this year we'll just try again next year unless we really make a full commitment to someone. Such as Gregg Williams.

How did I not see a Big Joe reference coming? I'm getting too old for this sh---(EXPLOSION!)

The Cowher fans seem to want stability by the comments I've heard around the Intarweb, and in a quest for stability, they would risk completely overturning the coaching staff and much of the roster. That's called "irony", despite what Miss Morrisette may have told you.

Redskins247
01-09-2008, 01:15 AM
These are great points, and one's that I agree with as well. But the fact of the matter is, we as fans (especially here) I think do far more research into the thought process of hiring someone like Cowher, when all that Danny does is think...."I want Bill Cowher"....and then Danny goes and gets Bill Cowher....whatever it takes.

lowblowlandry
01-09-2008, 03:11 AM
I agree. I really don't want to see Cowher in D.C. and I think the players (especially our defense) would resent him for taking the job they believed should have gone to Greg Williams. Also, we were just starting to get some positive media attention for the first time in years as a team that emphasizes family first, a place where prospective free agents might want to come for a little less maybe. Let's not screw that up and go back to making splashy moves from outside of the organization, like we used to.

But not to worry, I totally believe Snyder is smarter that a lot of fans give him credit for and he will make the right move by giving the job to G. Williams. You don't become a self made multi-millionaire/billionaire with just dumb luck.

saden1
01-09-2008, 03:21 AM
How about "I'm not ready to go through rebuilding years?" It takes two years for most new coach to be successful which means most of our players will be senior citizens eligible for Medicare and their prime years would be wasted.

Snyder would be stupid not to try and keep both GW and Saunders.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum