Chad Johnson?

I believe that picture is real and it was taken last offseason.

I threw out Javon Walker & people here had good reasons we shouldn't trade for him. I already have an opinion of CJ & I don't think he's a good fit here, even w/Gibbs gone. The chemistry that's been established here is fragile & doesn't need a guy like that to taint it.

He is still a top wr though, can't deny his ability & work ethic. I just think he's become more of a problem & might continue to do so here.

CJ turns 30 tomorrow.

30 isn't a horrible age for WR like it is for RB.

30 isn't a horrible age for WR like it is for RB.but do you pay a 30 year old WR top free agent money at that position? I say hell no. Knowing what we know about Johnson, he won't be open to anything less than top dollar.

but do you pay a 30 year old WR top free agent money at that position? I say hell no. Knowing what we know about Johnson, he won't be open to anything less than top dollar.

Redskins typically give out 3-year contracts. They are technically like 5, 6, or 7-year deals, but they are designed to be restructured or cut after 3 years. So, you are only signing him to what amounts to a 3-year deal. I have no doubt that CJ can produce like a top WR the next three years. So, whether he's 25 or 30 really isn't a big deal to me.

Is this real or a photoshopped picture?

Honestly, I'm not sure. It was emailed to me this morning.

That's another reason not to trade for him.

We wouldn't have to trade for him the word is the Bengals might release him.

We wouldn't have to trade for him the word is the Bengals might release him.

Really? From where? I can't imagine anyone letting go of anyone of that caliber without any compensation.

I'm not the biggest CJ fan, because of his ego. However, many prima donna wide receivers have had a change of heart after finding new homes. Don't know if its worth the risk though

too big of a move, lets keep some stability, no huge name signings, especially when we would have to yet again sacrifice draft picks