I disagree. It was a must win game regardless of whether the Vikings lost or not.
I agree. It was important to keep the momentum going.
It definitely wasn't worthless.
NinjaLink
12-31-2007, 03:07 PM
The Cowboys were trying, they were just getting embarassed. You couldn't see the frustrations on the starter(s) faces? They were just getting an ass whooping.
70Chip
12-31-2007, 03:25 PM
Anthony Montgomery played his best game as a Redskin. He was dominating the middle, allowing Fletcher and Godfrey to roam free.
in turn it was worthless for both the skins and the boyz afterall since the broncos took care of buisness ..
this is the toughest rivalry in sports and they tell us this game meant nothing,yeah right sure...it goes in the win column and i,ll take it too.
1 yard is just that 1 yard...the longest yard....
We go into the playoffs being billed a the "Hottest Team" in pro ball! The team certainly believes it (which is most important). The ASS kickin' Big D recieved served to further cement that sentiment. The team and fans are beginning to believe in the .......destiny factor, and possibly the ST is pulling some strings from the other side............certainly not worthless
HTTR
Redskin Warrior
12-31-2007, 04:24 PM
Well Sandtrap will say that because they did not even try. Didn't you see their O line just stand up and let our D line just run by them and then their runner just sliding to the ground.
B.S. they didn't try look Romo & Witten were trying so was Marion Barber for his individual record also. Well our defense is ready and playing with passion first was AP now Dallas you have to be excited about the playoff.
I have not seen that "swarming" style of shutdown D in a long time. Maybe having Dex in the booth had a positive motivating effect? Dude is a maniac
Fewest Yards Gained Rushing, Game
-53 Detroit vs. Chi. Cardinals, Oct. 17, 1943
-36 Philadelphia vs. Chi. Bears, Nov. 19, 1939
-33 Brooklyn vs. Phil-Pitt, Oct. 2, 1943
gibbsisgod
01-02-2008, 09:10 AM
Fewest Yards Gained Rushing, Game
-53 Detroit vs. Chi. Cardinals, Oct. 17, 1943
-36 Philadelphia vs. Chi. Bears, Nov. 19, 1939
-33 Brooklyn vs. Phil-Pitt, Oct. 2, 1943I think back then they used to take yards lost on a sack off of the rushing totals. They didn't even keep sack statistics until the 80's(I think). They still do it that way in college. -53 yards is still very impressive but those stats are a little misleading.
GoSkins!
01-02-2008, 10:26 AM
Primetime Sanders said this morning that Jason Garrett wasn't about to show all his cards in a game like this. Bullshit!
Well... I have to agree with that. I would bet that Dallas was attempting to win playing fundamental football, but they probably held back a lot with the scheme knowing that they could have to face us in the playoffs. In that case, we did exactly what we should have done. We totally dominated them. That is not what they wanted to see. Now, whether they admit it or not, know that they will have their hands full if they see us again no matter what they held back.
I bet they put in just enough scheme that they thought they could get the individual accomplishments, which they couldn't, but it was evident by how long they left there starters in that they were very uncomfortable with how bad they were getting their butts kicked.
firstdown
01-02-2008, 10:46 AM
We go into the playoffs being billed a the "Hottest Team" in pro ball! The team certainly believes it (which is most important). The ASS kickin' Big D recieved served to further cement that sentiment. The team and fans are beginning to believe in the .......destiny factor, and possibly the ST is pulling some strings from the other side............certainly not worthless
HTTR
I think we are being billed as the hottest team in the NFC as the Pats are the hottest team in the NFL right now. Even if Dallas did not try that hard giving us a big win like that has really giving this team a big boost which will come back to haunt them.