Ogunleye chances back now?

Williams retired.bostons out for season,they need offense and we have gardener to give away.How does that sound gardener for wale or gardener and betts for wale?

We have Gardener to give away? No we don't!!! He's a proven 1000 yard catcher no one else on the roster besides Coles is. No my friend, the season is upon us and we don't have Gardener to give away.

man what did Miami ever do to deserve this??

i'd be more than willing to trade 50/50 for Ogun now that they need a reciever, but i'd imagine Ogun is Miami's best asset right now, and they'd save it for a back since their offense/playbook is more tuned to that than passing.

At this point in the offseason i think Gibbs is smart enough to leave the team intact, hes not dumb like danny

The guy want's a max contract, I don't see how we could sign him.

We have Gardener to give away? No we don't!!! He's a proven 1000 yard catcher no one else on the roster besides Coles is. No my friend, the season is upon us and we don't have Gardener to give away.

I've been saying since day one that we should make this trade (it will take a draft pick too). And now, Miami has even more reason to be interested.

1. Gibbs is definitely interested in Wale - too many rumors for it not to be so.

2. Gardner drops too many passes - and it ALWAYS seems to be in a key (3rd down) situation. He will be on the bench by week 4 - get something for him!!

3. Ogunleye has proven to be a premier pass rusher. The Redskins DEFINITELY need one. If you don't believe it, read what ALL of the "experts" say (both PRO Skins and ANTI Skins). That is a real problem area for the team.

4. WR is our only "overstocked" position. (Don't count TE - none of them have any drawing power). Depth is nice, but NOT at the expense of leaving another key position weak.

5. Someone said we can't afford him. One of the Redskins' typical backloaded contracts will do the job. Gardner's trade opens up over $1M this year, more next. And the final roster has not yet been decided...

plus we will get the money back for Walt Harris. We could afford him, I dont knwo if getting rid of Gardner is the best move though, Coles could go down at anytime with his toe. Jacobs is injured all the time, thrash is not a starting receiver.. that would leave us with that, McCants and Thrash at 1 and 2 if we trade Gardner and Coles goes down? Not a situation I want to be in. Expeciallsy ien out linebackers seem to be getting a lot of pressure.

I don't like the idea of giving up Gardner right when he is developing into a quality WR. I look for him to be in the Monk roll. While Coles will be in the Clark roll. Wale would be a great addition but I would rather trade next years #1 pick and let them find another WR or RB with that.

I don't see Gibbs making a move this late in the offseason.

I don't like the idea of giving up Gardner right when he is developing into a quality WR. I look for him to be in the Monk roll. While Coles will be in the Clark roll. Wale would be a great addition but I would rather trade next years #1 pick and let them find another WR or RB with that.

No way you get him for a #1 now. What is their motivation? They have needs now and Wannstadt's job is on the line. They have cap room now to sign him if they do'n use him to fill a more pressing need. They will either sign him or trade him for some immediate offensive help. I think it will be the latter. Probably not to the Skins, but I would love to see it. A lot of folks like to talk about us trading a shutdown CB. With a premier pass rusher added to our D (and thanks to Greg Williams), we would have a shutdown DEFENSE. With DL pressure in addition to Washington and Arrington, our good DB's would look like the best in the league.