What is our game plan for victory versus Chicago

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5

DynamiteRave
12-02-2007, 05:24 PM
I actually liked the running game today. So I'd stick with that. I think running is boring but today I did see how the running game opened up the PA pass. The Bills were biting on PA really bad today. So I'm hoping it could work the same way against the Bears. So, basically I think it's gonna be a run heavy game.

EternalEnigma21
12-02-2007, 05:35 PM
portis has been slamming up the middle and running stretch plays... we've only seen betts on sweeps and counters with pulling linemen blocking in front of him...

Portis is a better back. They pretty much proved that early on this season.

scafuri27
12-02-2007, 05:46 PM
keep the ball out of devin hester's hands.. and run some no huddle offense. If we have a lead in the second half keep throwing the ball.

SouperMeister
12-02-2007, 05:52 PM
Bottom line is we have to get the running game back on track. Some may call it boring, but you have to be able to run the ball.Agreed. Jason is still too mistake prone to put the entire offensive team on his shoulders. I would also like to see Betts get more carries when Portis is struggling at 2 YPC.

Smooter
12-02-2007, 06:40 PM
If we lose against the bears I have to wear a cowboys hat at work for a week. Go skins!

SmootSmack
12-02-2007, 06:45 PM
all we gotta do is kick it out of bounds and pass to wherever adam archuletta is and we will win 569-3

So you're saying we'll miss an extra point(81 TDs, 1 FG, one missed xp). God, you're such a hater!!! :)

JankySpanky80
12-02-2007, 06:56 PM
What hurts is JC is good for a fumble and an INT a game. Always at the most critical time. JC is another year away from being a solid QB, Lets face it. He is good but i think WE ALL expect too much from him. We are close. A true number 1 wideout and minor upgrades on the oline. On defense i have no idea. The free safety position is gonna be a nightmare because no matter who they put in there we as fans will always compare that person too Sean Taylor. Honestly i don't know how you can replace him. IMO i say we get a DE with the 1st rounder and get a WR with the second. They have won 5 games so far. Thats the same as last year and i can't see us winning another one this year. Bears in a close one. Last i seen they were taking it to the Giants.

SouperMeister
12-02-2007, 07:01 PM
What hurts is JC is good for a fumble and an INT a game. Always at the most critical time. JC is another year away from being a solid QB, Lets face it. He is good but i think WE ALL expect too much from him. We are close. A true number 1 wideout and minor upgrades on the oline. On defense i have no idea. The free safety position is gonna be a nightmare because no matter who they put in there we as fans will always compare that person too Sean Taylor. Honestly i don't know how you can replace him. IMO i say we get a DE with the 1st rounder and get a WR with the second. They have won 5 games so far. Thats the same as last year and i can't see us winning another one this year. Bears in a close one. Last i seen they were taking it to the Giants.Getting a dominant DE will make the entire secondary better. We need to become more dominant in the trenches.

EternalEnigma21
12-02-2007, 07:02 PM
I was hopin for a safety... lol...

Rhaamses
12-02-2007, 07:27 PM
I really think that better O-Line play / Personnel who make everything better. Granted a better D Line would make the cover two look better, a better O-line would keep the D off the field. I really am starting to believe that the coaching staff really sees how deficient the O-Line is, and is limiting the potential play calling because of this. There may not be a John Hannah out there to draft (and I probably would not draft an O-Lineman in the 1st), but somebody found Jacoby playing D Line and switched him over to O. Call Bethard and give me somebody who can Push and Protect.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum