ST Murder Investigation Thread

I hate to say this, and here is my theory.

No disrespect at all but... here goes.

Jackie has been having an affair with the suspect, and Sean came home early... or something (shot next to private area)

It seems funny how she said he was shot in the bedroom, and then CP said it was outside the bedroom, and if your boyfriend is STILL IN THE BEDROOM AND GOT SHOT, wouldn't you look to see who it was? I mean, covers or not, I would have looked. Too fishy to me.

Even funnier, if we could see what clothing he was in when he was shot, we might be able to know. He came home early, and dude had a gun, or maybe it was Jackie's ex boyfriend, IE the shot next to his nuts....


Last scenario, when the door was busted down, ST might have hit his arm..... like if you barrell into a room and try to shoot someone, you are probably pointing at his chest or head, but then ST hit his arm real fast while firing. Those are just some of my opinions. It was DEFENITELY someone he knew. No question.

It wouldnt be the first time a spouse or gf was somehow involved in something like this. I'm sure the cops have questioned her extensively.

I hate to say this, and here is my theory.
No disrespect at all but... here goes.
Jackie has been having an affair with the suspect, and Sean came home early... or something (shot next to private area)

I stopped reading after this. There are a few people in the world that don't have to worry about their girl cheating on them and Sean Taylor was one of them. Nobody is that crazy.

I stopped reading after this. There are a few people in the world that don't have to worry about their girl cheating on them and Sean Taylor was one of them. Nobody is that crazy.

You know this how?

You're assuming the suspect was a great shot. Just because Taylor was shot near the groin doesn't mean that was the intent.


I tried to make this same point numerous times in this thread. Deaf ears...

You know this how?

Uhhhh because Sean Taylor was a bad man and nobody would be crazy enough to mess with his girl. People take stuff a little too literally around here sometimes.

I hate to say this, and here is my theory.

No disrespect at all but... here goes.

Jackie has been having an affair with the suspect, and Sean came home early... or something (shot next to private area)

It seems funny how she said he was shot in the bedroom, and then CP said it was outside the bedroom, and if your boyfriend is STILL IN THE BEDROOM AND GOT SHOT, wouldn't you look to see who it was? I mean, covers or not, I would have looked. Too fishy to me.

Even funnier, if we could see what clothing he was in when he was shot, we might be able to know. He came home early, and dude had a gun, or maybe it was Jackie's ex boyfriend, IE the shot next to his nuts....


Last scenario, when the door was busted down, ST might have hit his arm..... like if you barrell into a room and try to shoot someone, you are probably pointing at his chest or head, but then ST hit his arm real fast while firing. Those are just some of my opinions. It was DEFENITELY someone he knew. No question.

You're making an awfully big speculation. I don't think I see any of it falling into place; except the girlfriend *does* need to be questioned more because why did she have so much trouble dialing for help [15 minutes while your man's on the floor bleeding to death?!] and she had to have seen something to give the cops some sort of little detail as to what the shooter looked like... she was in the same room!!

But the whole cheating scenario, shot near the groin thing... it just doesn't do it for me. I don't think he caught her cheating on him, and I definitely don't think that the shooter had that particular area in his aim.

In conclusion, nice fabrication and vision of that fateful night, but I'm not buying into this one.

CNN is reporting (http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/11/29/taylor/index.html) that "Lt. Nancy Perez with the Miami-Dade Police Department said investigators were looking for an "unknown suspect." What the hell does that mean? Does that mean that they are looking for evidence which will lead them to identify and locate a person? Or does it mean that they have already identified someone, whose identity has not been revealed to the press?

This same spokeswoman gave misleading statements the other day. Aren't spokespersons supposed to be articulate?

BTW, I personally don't like the speculation about Taylor's wife. This poor woman lost her fiance and the father of her child, yet people are willing to pin the blame on her without any real support?

CNN is reporting (http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/11/29/taylor/index.html) that "Lt. Nancy Perez with the Miami-Dade Police Department said investigators were looking for an "unknown suspect." What the hell does that mean? Does that mean that they are looking for evidence which will lead them to identify and locate a person? Or does it mean that they have already identified someone, whose identity has not been revealed to the press?

This same spokeswoman gave misleading statements the other day. Aren't spokespersons supposed to be articulate?

BTW, I personally don't like the speculation about Taylor's wife. This poor woman lost her fiance and the father of her child, yet people are willing to pin the blame on her without any real support?

I agree; there's a chance that yes she could have been involved, but that's a very HUGE speculation and people should keep hush about things like that out of respect for the Taylor family in their time of mourning.

Truth is, you guys know nothing about what really happened and all this wild speculation leaves me feeling sick to the stomach.

Well, at least there's some positive news...