Daseal
11-25-2007, 03:43 PM
Im totally with hurrykaine. Gotta go with a QB sneak there, not an uber predictable run to the *gasp* left. I like the aggressive nature of the call.
4th and shortDaseal 11-25-2007, 03:43 PM Im totally with hurrykaine. Gotta go with a QB sneak there, not an uber predictable run to the *gasp* left. I like the aggressive nature of the call. MTK 11-25-2007, 03:48 PM I think they were looking for the sneak in that situation, either way it doesn't change the fact we now have 5 turnovers. It's awfully tough to win when you turnover the ball that much. Daseal 11-25-2007, 03:55 PM Well Matty, when you need a feet, they can look for the sneak. A big QB like Campbell can fall forward for that, and if anything they will kinda give him the benefit of the doubt with it muddled mheisig 11-25-2007, 04:00 PM I'm totally behind him on all the 4th down calls. Yeah someone's gonna bitch cause we didn't make one and hingsight's 20-20, but our season and playoff hopes are on the line and we're trailing by quite a bit, go for the throat and try for that TD. At least if we go down in flames we'll know we tried to win it. jdlea 11-25-2007, 04:08 PM I'm totally behind him on all the 4th down calls. Yeah someone's gonna bitch cause we didn't make one and hingsight's 20-20, but our season and playoff hopes are on the line and we're trailing by quite a bit, go for the throat and try for that TD. At least if we go down in flames we'll know we tried to win it. Oh please, there was no hindsight about it, I knew it was a bad call regardless. I hated the call before the play, I hated the playcall and I hate the fact that I forced them to press when they should have been looking to get into field goal range at the end of the game. It totally changed the football game and all they needed to do was kick. The first time I've wanted them to be conservative all year and take the points to make a 1 possession game, they stupidly try to run and it contributed to the loss of the game. pdid5000 11-25-2007, 04:21 PM i was screaming at the tv when they did'nt take the 3 pts. horrible call. BrunellMVP? 11-25-2007, 05:57 PM I don't mind the aggressive call- i agree that it may not have been the right time for it, turning a two possession game into one, but what happend? we failed (all good teams should get a foot), and then we forced a 3 and out on the bucs possession, and then kicked a field goal. So really, we got out 3 points, and the one possession game, we just lost a few mins in the process. Gibbs was trying to make a statement, his team let him down. Cowell 11-25-2007, 05:59 PM I have to say I agreed with the call, we really needed a touchdown and if we had converted we probably would have won. GTripp0012 11-26-2007, 01:01 AM Im totally with hurrykaine. Gotta go with a QB sneak there, not an uber predictable run to the *gasp* left. I like the aggressive nature of the call.I agree with this logic. They can look for the sneak all they want, but they can't prevent us from getting the first. On the other hand, if we get a 4th down running play blocked up front, Portis ends up in the endzone on the play. Kendall needs to give a better effort than a simple lunge at Derrick Brooks. chrisl4064 11-26-2007, 01:06 AM i definately respected the decision to go for it, would i have liked to have seen a QB sneak, yeah sure. But i wont fault Gibbs at all on this. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum