The INT that wasn't

What did you guys think of the call to overturn the INT by McIntosh, which regardless was a great read and reaction by him.

I'm still not convinced there was indisputable visual evidence to overturn that call.

Totally agree. I don't think it should have been overturned at all. Talk about a game changer. Rocky has quitely become a very solid linebacker, I might add.

I thought that Rocky's hand was under the ball, but I also thought that the refs would overturn the call.

The point of the ball clearly hit the ground and he still did not have total control of the ball as he rolled over. I think the two ints that we missed cost us more.

Agree here...while it was clear the ball was moving a bit when he turned over, it wasn't on the ground- and looked pinned to his leg. REally, I was 50/50 on it when it went to review...i feel like we are snake bitten when it comes to challenges

While in slow motion, you can see the ball hit the ground, I'm not sure how that could have been seen in regular speed. The TV coverage needs to get better at showing the replays in regular speed as well as slo-mo...

Agree here...while it was clear the ball was moving a bit when he turned over, it wasn't on the ground- and looked pinned to his leg. REally, I was 50/50 on it when it went to review...i feel like we are snake bitten when it comes to challenges
In slow mo they showed the point of the ball hitting the ground and if the ball is moving at all it is not a catch.

I don't think it should have been overturned. We were in Dallas tho.

It wasn't a catch. It hit the ground.

After the past couple weeks, the skins secondary should spend some practice time on catching the football. Those are game changers that we are missing with S. Taylor out of the lineup. Fletcher dropped a sure Int too.